2004
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-26538-4_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Markers for Identification and Evaluation of Genetic Resources in Forest Trees: Case Studies in Abies, Picea and Populus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Putative tetraploid poplar fusion lines are first studied with respect to the destiny of the nuclei; thus, clone-specific nuclear microsatellite (SSR) markers (Bruegmann and Fladung 2013), are employed that are often used for clone identification, the evaluation of genetic resources, or parentage analysis (Ziegenhagen and Fladung 2004;Liesebach et al 2010;Schröder and Fladung 2010). To unravel the destiny of the chloroplasts, species-specific SNP markers have been developed for chloroplasts of different poplar species (Schröder et al 2011;2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Putative tetraploid poplar fusion lines are first studied with respect to the destiny of the nuclei; thus, clone-specific nuclear microsatellite (SSR) markers (Bruegmann and Fladung 2013), are employed that are often used for clone identification, the evaluation of genetic resources, or parentage analysis (Ziegenhagen and Fladung 2004;Liesebach et al 2010;Schröder and Fladung 2010). To unravel the destiny of the chloroplasts, species-specific SNP markers have been developed for chloroplasts of different poplar species (Schröder et al 2011;2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, in the local varieties the samara stalk length was greater (nearly three times) than in F. ornus, while the apical leaf length/width ratio and the number of samaras/raceme of manna ash samples were approximately two and a half and eight times lower, respectively, separating the two groups compared. Variety identification based on morphological data can be verified using molecular analysis, because the environmental effects, epistatic interactions and pleiotropic effects can interfere with morphological traits evaluation, as in many forest trees [63].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since morphologically and anatomically different plant clones may look similar, it is essential to reliably identify those including discrimination from each other and from conspecific individuals or representatives of other closely related species. In forestry, the problem of individual identification is especially crucial since the external look of trees is highly dependable on environmental parameters [ 4 ]. At particular stages of natural ontogenesis of forest trees, for example, seedlings and saplings, and especially as calluses or explants in vitro cell culture, individuals may be indiscernible not only individually but also as far as species diagnoses are concerned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%