2016
DOI: 10.1101/gr.205468.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA methylation profiles of diverse Brachypodium distachyon align with underlying genetic diversity

Abstract: DNA methylation, a common modification of genomic DNA, is known to influence the expression of transposable elements as well as some genes. Although commonly viewed as an epigenetic mark, evidence has shown that underlying genetic variation, such as transposable element polymorphisms, often associate with differential DNA methylation states. To investigate the role of DNA methylation variation, transposable element polymorphism, and genomic diversity, whole-genome bisulfite sequencing was performed on genetica… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
31
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average percentages of methylation of CG, CHG and CHH contexts in leaf were 89.7%, 59.1% and 2.1%, respectively (Supplementary Table 24). The genome CG and CHG methylation levels are about the same as those in maize (86.4%, 70.9%) 33 , and are much higher than those in B. distachyon (56.5%, 35.3%) 34 and rice (44%, 24%) 35 . This is consistent with previous observations indicating a positive correlation between genome size, TE content and genomic methylation levels 36 .…”
Section: −13mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The average percentages of methylation of CG, CHG and CHH contexts in leaf were 89.7%, 59.1% and 2.1%, respectively (Supplementary Table 24). The genome CG and CHG methylation levels are about the same as those in maize (86.4%, 70.9%) 33 , and are much higher than those in B. distachyon (56.5%, 35.3%) 34 and rice (44%, 24%) 35 . This is consistent with previous observations indicating a positive correlation between genome size, TE content and genomic methylation levels 36 .…”
Section: −13mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Two unbiased approaches were used to identify differentially methylated regions (DMRs) based on previous approaches (Eichten, Stuart, Srivastava, Lister, & Borevitz, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of mCG, mCHG, and mCHH was determined as weighted methylation across reads at single cytosine resolution and across 100 bp tiles for genome-wide comparisons. .7 | Identifying differentially methylated regions Two unbiased approaches were used to identify differentially methylated regions (DMRs) based on previous approaches(Eichten, Stuart, Srivastava, Lister, & Borevitz, 2016).First, a strict approach was used to identify high confidence DMRs using Bayesian hierarchical modelling, at single cytosine resolution, using the R package DSS (v2.10.0;Feng, Conneely, & Wu, 2014)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B. distachyon reads for seven inbred lines [42] were also obtained from the SRA (Bd21, SRR1972494; Bd21-3, SRR1972495; Bd1-1, SRR1972498; Bd3-1, SRR1972496; Bd30-1, SRR1972497; BdTR12C, SRR1972499; Koz3, SRR1972500). Maize reads were mapped to the B73 reference genome version 2, and B. distachyon reads were mapped to the Bd21 v2 reference genome.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%