“…Specifically, the inconsistencies are coming not only from the different tissues analyzed (blood, prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate, cerebellum, and sperm), but also due to methodological variations in the studies: three studies have used methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP-seq) followed by next generation sequencing (Li et al, 2015; Xiao et al, 2014; Zhao et al, 2015), two studies have used the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation27 beadchip (Chen et al, 2014; Dempster et al, 2011), three studies have used the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 beadchip (Houtepen et al, 2016; Sabunciyan et al, 2015; Walker et al, 2016), and one used CpG-island microarrays (Mill et al, 2008) for the assessment of methylation changes. Of note, even though MeDIP-seq and microarray-based analyses have been shown to present a good positive correlation, MeDIP-seq allows a wider interrogation of methylation regions of the genome, including thousands of non-RefSeq genes and repetitive elements that are not assessed in microarrays (Clark et al, 2012).…”