2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4618-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Methylation variability among individuals is related to CpGs cluster density and evolutionary signatures

Abstract: BackgroundIn recent years, epigenetics has gained a central role in the understanding of the process of natural selection. It is now clear how environmental impacts on the methylome could promote methylation variability with direct effects on disease etiology as well as phenotypic and genotypic variations in evolutionary processes. To identify possible factors influencing inter-individual methylation variability, we studied methylation values standard deviation of 166 healthy individuals searching for possible… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the so-called CCAAT box is highly conserved in all the promoters of the H1 loci and it is followed by a CA dinucleotide. www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ A correlation between the local methylation profiles and CpGs density is known [27][28][29] . CpGs proximal to a TSS show less variation (more stability) than distal CpGs 6 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the so-called CCAAT box is highly conserved in all the promoters of the H1 loci and it is followed by a CA dinucleotide. www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ A correlation between the local methylation profiles and CpGs density is known [27][28][29] . CpGs proximal to a TSS show less variation (more stability) than distal CpGs 6 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the effects of pre-processing on the between-sample variability and on the identification of Differentially Methylated Positions (DMPs) in case-control studies, we analyse four different collections of datasets. The datasets have been selected based on their sample size and on the assumption that there is no global DNA methylation variation among samples (see Introduction and [5]). This assumption is required to apply methods that are based on quantile normalization [4,6].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pre-processing pipeline designed to obtain methylation profiles from raw experimental data (.idat files) in the form of β-values (β = M/(M + U + α), where typically α = 100 [3]) is not standardized, even within the same technological platform, as illustrated in Table 2. Indeed, different pre-processing methods make different assumptions on the data regarding their distribution, their correlation structure and the extent (localized or global) of the DNA methylation variability on the genome [4], since this is still a matter of debate [5]. of this author is articulated in the 'author contributions' section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variability may contribute to the finding that there is no overlap in the CpGs described in the manuscripts reviewed (Additional file 2: Table S2). This variability may reflect the importance of immune system pathways, which may show greater DNAm volatility, in the response to air pollution exposure, and this may contribute to disease susceptibility differences between individuals over time [65].…”
Section: Effects Of Air Pollutants On Dna Methylation Across the Lifementioning
confidence: 99%