The advent of next generation sequencing (NGS) in 2010 has transformed medicine and particularly the growing field of monogenic inborn errors of immunity, including primary immunodeficiencies (PID). NGS has facilitated the discovery of novel disease-causing genes and the genetic diagnosis of patients with PID. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) is presently the most cost-effective approach for PID research and diagnostics, though whole genome sequencing (WGS) offers several advantages. The scientific or diagnostic challenge consists in selecting one or two candidate variants among thousands of NGS calls. Variant- and gene-level computational methods as well as immunological hypotheses can help to narrow down this genome-wide search. The key to success is a well-informed genetic hypothesis on three key aspects: mode of inheritance, clinical penetrance, and genetic heterogeneity of the condition. This determines the search strategy and the frequency cut-offs for candidate alleles. Subsequent functional validation of the disease-causing effect of the candidate variant is critical. Even the most up-to-date dry lab cannot clinch this validation without a seasoned wet lab. The multifariousness of variations entails an experimental rigor even greater than traditional Sanger sequencing-based approaches, in order not to assign PID to false positives. Finding the needle in the haystack takes patience, prudence, and discernment.