2016
DOI: 10.5301/tj.5000526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Repair Gene Polymorphisms in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with First-Line Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy

Abstract: The findings suggest that the investigated SNPs do not make any significant contribution to the outcome of NSCLC.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with what was found in other studies [22,34], the current study showed no statistically significant difference between the different genotypes in both SNPs and neither PFS nor OS. On the contrary, these findings contradict what was found in a trial on NSCLC patients where the TT genotype of rs1047768 had statistically significant shorter PFS and OS compared to the CC genotype [39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In accordance with what was found in other studies [22,34], the current study showed no statistically significant difference between the different genotypes in both SNPs and neither PFS nor OS. On the contrary, these findings contradict what was found in a trial on NSCLC patients where the TT genotype of rs1047768 had statistically significant shorter PFS and OS compared to the CC genotype [39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…On the other hand, for the rs1047768, the association was found in the general and recessive model representing a link with the C allele (major allele). Rulli et al found a similar association between ERCC1 (rs11615) genetic variants and the histologic subtypes of NSCLC [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, few studies have investigated the implication of the NER biological pathway and ERCC1 polymorphisms, including rs3212986[ 20 , 21 ], in hepatocarcinogenesis, and no data are available in Caucasian populations. The ERCC1 rs3212986 variant, located in the 3’ untranslated region (3’UTR) of the gene, is thought to increase transcript stability, although further biochemical studies are required to clarify the effect of this polymorphism on gene transcription and protein translation[ 22 , 23 ]. Based on our data, we inferred that the rs3212986 variant allele was associated with elevated ERCC1 expression and/or activity, which could lead to enhanced protection against the accumulation of mutagenic DNA lesions, and consequently, against hepatocarcinogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, there have been several ERCC1 SNPs examined for their cancer risk and s11615 and rs3212986 have been the most frequently studied. For example, identifying the ERCC1 rs11615 genotype may help in predicting a positive or poor outcome of platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with colorectal (29), advanced gastric (30-32) and breast cancer (33) as well as testicular germ cell tumors (34), ovarian (35,36), esophageal (37), and most importantly, non-small cell lung cancer (17)(18)(19)(20). Molecular studies consistently provided evidence showing that ERCC1 rs11615 T allele is associated with relatively lower expression of ERCC1 at both the mRNA and protein levels; however, its role as a predictive marker for cancer therapy is controversial (38-42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From late 1990s, evidence have been accumulating showing that in cancers, such as ovarian and gastric cancer, the expression level of ERCC1 may be a useful marker for clinical drug resistance for those patients with platinum-based chemo-treatments (16). In addition, it has also been suggested that ERCC1 downregulation is associated with increased chemotherapeutic sensitivity and, thus, considered as a predictive marker for lung patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy (17)(18)(19)(20). However, ERCC1 genotype is seldom evaluated as a predictor for lung cancer risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%