2015
DOI: 10.1038/nrc.2015.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA repair, genome stability and cancer: a historical perspective

Abstract: The multi-step process of cancer progresses over many years. The prevention of mutations by DNA repair pathways led to an early appreciation of a role for repair in cancer avoidance. However, the broader role for the DNA damage responses (DDR) emerged more slowly. We reflect on how our understanding of the steps leading to cancer unravelled, focusing on the role of the DDR. We consider how our current knowledge can be exploited for cancer therapy.3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
479
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 646 publications
(515 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
7
479
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…15 Mechanistic studies unveiled that the Hippo-DDR cooperation promotes replication fork stability, cell-cycle checkpoint activation and DNA repair. 14 On this premise, we hypothesized that the expression of phosphorylated MST1/2 (pMST1/2) and LATS1/2 (pLATS1/2) may be associated with the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in BC patients in a context-dependent manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Mechanistic studies unveiled that the Hippo-DDR cooperation promotes replication fork stability, cell-cycle checkpoint activation and DNA repair. 14 On this premise, we hypothesized that the expression of phosphorylated MST1/2 (pMST1/2) and LATS1/2 (pLATS1/2) may be associated with the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in BC patients in a context-dependent manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancer cells generally grow more rapidly than normal cells, and the rate of DNA replication is particularly elevated in these cells (19). DNA is unstable in its replication process (20), and thus RID-B may more easily bind to DNA in cancer cells than in normal cells, causing cancer cell death. Taken together, it may be proposed that cancer cells are more sensitive to RIDs compared with normal cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with this theory, acquisition of 'loss of function' mutations in these checkpoint proteins, most commonly p53, is associated with malignant progression. While not a universal phenomenon, the concept of the DDR as an 'anti-cancer barrier' is a plausible explanation for the high prevalence of DDR dysfunction in malignant disease, and identifies a family of attractive therapeutic targets (reviewed in [7]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%