2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Repair Profiling Reveals Nonrandom Outcomes at Cas9-Mediated Breaks

Abstract: The repair outcomes at site-specific DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) generated by the RNA-guided DNA endonuclease Cas9 determine how gene function is altered. Despite the widespread adoption of CRISPR-Cas9 technology to induce DSBs for genome engineering, the resulting repair products have not been examined in depth. Here, the DNA repair profiles of 223 sites in the human genome demonstrate that the pattern of DNA repair following Cas9 cutting at each site is nonrandom and consistent across experimental replic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

67
372
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 419 publications
(440 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(47 reference statements)
67
372
1
Order By: Relevance
“…http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/392217 doi: bioRxiv preprint first posted online Aug. 15, 2018; Analysis of Cas9-treated samples at each guide target location suggests that the position of the most-frequently deleted bases varied between genomic loci, a finding which is similar to previous descriptions of guide-specific deletion profiles 19 . The HEK2, EMX1, and FANCF guides induced deletions at position 17 (from the 5' end of the guide target), while Cas9-mediated deletion activity is predominantly observed at position 16 for the HEK3 and HEK4 guides (Supplementary Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/392217 doi: bioRxiv preprint first posted online Aug. 15, 2018; Analysis of Cas9-treated samples at each guide target location suggests that the position of the most-frequently deleted bases varied between genomic loci, a finding which is similar to previous descriptions of guide-specific deletion profiles 19 . The HEK2, EMX1, and FANCF guides induced deletions at position 17 (from the 5' end of the guide target), while Cas9-mediated deletion activity is predominantly observed at position 16 for the HEK3 and HEK4 guides (Supplementary Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…However, endonuclease activity can also have undesired on-target effects. Notably, nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) downstream of Cas9-mediated cleavage is associated with an increased risk of indel formation (van Overbeek et al 2016). This has prompted the development of Cas9 derivatives that nick rather than cleave DNA (Cong et al 2013; Mali et al 2013), shifting repair pathway choice away from NHEJ and toward HR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was important since CRISPR/Cas9 leads to various indel sizes [19], thus some might be more or less easily discriminated (due to differences in inner primer affinity), and we thought that optimization was required to enable discrimination of all of them from wild type. We first tested whether there is an optimal orientation of the inner primers (Fig 2A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%