2023
DOI: 10.1007/s12539-023-00559-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Sequence Optimization Design of Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm Based on Billiard Hitting Strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimization standard deviation is the lowest in F(1), F(5), and F (7), indicating strong search stability. Additionally, RPSO outperforms the APGSK-IMODE algorithm on the F(1), F(5), and F (11) functions; the EA4eig algorithm on the F(11) function; and the IMODE algorithm on the F(3), F(4), F(5), F (7), F(8), F (10), and F (11) functions in terms of the optimal value. RPSO also outperforms the AGSK algorithm on the F(4), F(5), and F(11) functions.…”
Section: Comparison With the Top Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The optimization standard deviation is the lowest in F(1), F(5), and F (7), indicating strong search stability. Additionally, RPSO outperforms the APGSK-IMODE algorithm on the F(1), F(5), and F (11) functions; the EA4eig algorithm on the F(11) function; and the IMODE algorithm on the F(3), F(4), F(5), F (7), F(8), F (10), and F (11) functions in terms of the optimal value. RPSO also outperforms the AGSK algorithm on the F(4), F(5), and F(11) functions.…”
Section: Comparison With the Top Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…RPSO also outperforms the AGSK algorithm on the F(4), F(5), and F(11) functions. In terms of the worst value, RPSO outperforms the APGSK-IMODE algorithm on the F(1) and F(4) functions; the EA4eig algorithm on the F (10) and F (11) functions; and the IMODE algorithm on the F(4), F(5), F (7), F (10), and F (11) functions. RPSO also outperforms the PVADE algorithm on the F(9) and F (10) functions; and the AGSK algorithm on the F(1), F(4), F(5), and F(11) functions.…”
Section: Comparison With the Top Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As one of the novel algorithms, AOA was initially applied to numerical optimization problems and engineering design problems. Due to its uncomplicated structure and excellent performance, AOA has covered many areas such as support vector regression (SVR) parameter optimization [ 2 ], tuning PID controllers [ 3 , 4 ], fuel cell parameter extraction [ 5 ], DNA sequence optimization design [ 6 ], clustering optimization [ 7 , 8 ], power system stabilizer design [ 9 ], feature selection [ 10 ], photovoltaic parameter optimization [ 11 , 12 , 13 ], robot path planning [ 14 ], wireless sensor network location and deployment [ 15 ], IoT workflow scheduling [ 16 ], image segmentation [ 17 ], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%