1979
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2787(79)90002-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA sequence organization in the alga Euglena gracilis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intense nuclear staining in Euglena compared to T.brucei is not surprising, since Euglena diploid nuclei contain 3.0 pg DNA (22) and T.brucei nuclei only 0.1 pg (23). In T.brucei, a substantial fraction of J is in the telomeric (GGGTTA) n repeats (24) and this is also evident from the pictures in Figure 2 that show that part of the punctate J staining coincides with the punctate staining of the clustered telomeres of T.brucei.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The intense nuclear staining in Euglena compared to T.brucei is not surprising, since Euglena diploid nuclei contain 3.0 pg DNA (22) and T.brucei nuclei only 0.1 pg (23). In T.brucei, a substantial fraction of J is in the telomeric (GGGTTA) n repeats (24) and this is also evident from the pictures in Figure 2 that show that part of the punctate J staining coincides with the punctate staining of the clustered telomeres of T.brucei.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The Olisthodiscus genome is composed of 45% repeat DNA sequences. This amount of middle repetitive DNA is also seen in similar proportion in two other algae (Rawson et al, 1979;Hinnebusch et al, 1980) with high nuclear DNA content, namely, Euglena gracilis and Crypthicodinium cohnii, but is minimal (Bayen & Dalmon, 1975; Prima et al, 1974;Howell & Walker, 1976;Siu et al, 1974) in Chlorella pyrenoidosa, Chlorella vulgaris, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, and Polytoma obtusum, whose small genomes have virtually no (except for rRNA cistrons) repeat sequences. Since these seven organisms represent the entire literature of DNA sequence organization studies of algal cells, it is premature to initiate an evolutionary (Eden & Hendrick, 1978) or genomic size (Hutchinson et al, 1980;Thompson & Murray, 1980) comparison as possible factors effecting repeated DNA distribution, for these organisms represent four different phyla and have almost an 80-fold difference in haploid DNA content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, it must be noted that although in low number, repeated segments do exist which are long enough to occupy a major portion of a 3000 base pair DNA fragment. This information places Olisthodiscus among the few unicellular algae, most of which are chlorophytes (Bayen & Dalmon, 1975; Rawson et al, 1979;Howell & Walker, 1976;Siu et al, 1974;Roberts et al, 1974) for which genome size is reliably known. It is interesting to note that a cellular DNA content such as that observed in Olisthodiscus is not unique among the chromophytic algae.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Euglenoid flagellates have condensed chromosomes in interphase and throughout the mitotic cycle (Leedale, , ; Gillott & Triemer, ), consistent with the finding that the majority of the genome contains non‐coding DNA that is not transcribed (Ebenezer et al, , ). The large fraction of repetitive DNA (65%) and relatively high proportion of foldback DNA (14%) may be responsible for the continually condensed structure of the Euglena chromosomes (Rawson et al, ). Permanently condensed heterochromatin was recently observed also in diplonemids (Tashyreva et al, ).…”
Section: Euglenozoan Nuclear Genomesmentioning
confidence: 99%