2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-015-1284-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA transfer—a never ending story. A study on scenarios involving a second person as carrier

Abstract: The transfer of DNA directly from one item to another has been shown in many studies with elaborate discussions on the nature of the DNA donor as well as material and surface of the items or surrounding features. Every DNA transfer scenario one can imagine seems to be possible. This evokes more and more intricate scenarios proposed by lawyers or attorneys searching for an explanation of the DNA of a certain person on a distinct item with impact on a crime. At court, the forensic genetic scientist has to commen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reasons for this could be due to these surfaces being the largest within the experiment, having been sampled using tape lifts in Lab B, and being the surfaces touched for the longest duration, as well as them being the only fabric surfaces sampled. Several studies have shown that in general, fabric substrates pick-up and retain DNA better than non-porous substrates [20][21][22][23]. Furthermore, the relatively higher number of contributors to profiles generated from the chair seats and backrests may indicate that clothing picks up DNA from locations it comes into contact with and transfers some of it to these items when the person wearing the clothing sits on the chair, where it can accumulate [18,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reasons for this could be due to these surfaces being the largest within the experiment, having been sampled using tape lifts in Lab B, and being the surfaces touched for the longest duration, as well as them being the only fabric surfaces sampled. Several studies have shown that in general, fabric substrates pick-up and retain DNA better than non-porous substrates [20][21][22][23]. Furthermore, the relatively higher number of contributors to profiles generated from the chair seats and backrests may indicate that clothing picks up DNA from locations it comes into contact with and transfers some of it to these items when the person wearing the clothing sits on the chair, where it can accumulate [18,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA has been demonstrably transferred by handling both with and without gloves [97], from a range of items to both secondary and tertiary objects [98]. The transferred DNA may yield profiles ranging in quality from non-existent to complete and database-uploadable [97,98], following either prolonged or brief social contact [99], leaving unpredictability (see Table 2).…”
Section: Transfer Of Trace Dna After Initial Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof-of-concept studies report the deposition of DNA to greater or lesser degrees on surfaces that collect DNA well or not. DNA has been recovered successfully from a wide range of substrates including metal cables [6], lipstick [101], car interiors [102], shoes [42,103], firearms and ammunition [104,43], plastic bags [97,105], sheets [78], paper [106,107], and of course, fingerprints [30,108]. Generally rough and porous surface are reported to be superior collectors of DNA to smooth ones; wood is preferable to fabrics followed by glass [8], cotton being better than plastic upon consistent handling [48].…”
Section: Substrate or Surface Interaction With Trace Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite increased attention, and due to the development of more and more sensitive DNA analysis, alternative scenarios are always represented, involving DNA transfer through a secondary person or medium. The minute amount of a few cells or DNA molecules, which may be applicable for amplification, is not recognizable typically in an autopsy environment and is easily transferable between cases [4,117,118]. Although methodological developments are continuously making efforts to eliminate the effect of contamination artifacts from the profiling process [119,120], less appropriate autopsy sampling, incorporating the undetected contamination incidents, can lead to false interpretation within a DNA laboratory [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%