2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.07.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA vaccination in aquaculture — Expert judgments of impacts on environment and fish health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
13
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…These include the induction of autoimmune responses, e.g. antibodies to mammalian or fish DNA (Gillund et al, 2008). In addition since the DNA backbone of a DNA vaccine is a plasmid of bacterial origin it may also have intrinsic immunostimulatory activity.…”
Section: ! 83mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These include the induction of autoimmune responses, e.g. antibodies to mammalian or fish DNA (Gillund et al, 2008). In addition since the DNA backbone of a DNA vaccine is a plasmid of bacterial origin it may also have intrinsic immunostimulatory activity.…”
Section: ! 83mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study in Norway on potential adverse effects by DNA vaccines In a study by Gillund et al (2008) Norwegian scientists within academia and industry and representatives from governmental authorities was asked about potential adverse consequences from DNA vaccination.…”
Section: Chromosomal Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aquaculture has developed rapidly over the last decades in order to meet the growing demand for marine foods, a demand that cannot be met by increased harvest of wild stocks as they already are under stress from commercial fisheries , Gillund et al, 2008, Bostock, 2011. Many species, ranging from sea urchins to salmon, are now farmed effectively at a large scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a need for research with focus on the stability of the vectors and of the DNA construct, and if there are any unintended immunological impacts, the biological effect of the vaccine after injection (e.g. persistence, distribution, expression and integration) (Gillund et al, 2008a(Gillund et al, , 2008b. For GM vaccines it is important to investigate potential recombination with relatives and spread in the environment by vectors (Myhr & Traavik, 2011).…”
Section: Ipr and The Introduction Of Gm And Dna Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%