2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2019.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNS of turbulent low Mach channel flow under asymmetric high temperature gradient: Effect of thermal boundary condition on turbulence statistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, neither the temperature nor the heat flux are spatially constant over the walls of the solar receiver. Avellaneda et al 47 show that there are not significant differences between the two types of thermal boundaries conditions for turbulent low Mach channel flow under asymmetric high temperature gradient. The thermodynamical pressure, P 0 , is 10 bars.…”
Section: Study Configuration a Channel Flow Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, neither the temperature nor the heat flux are spatially constant over the walls of the solar receiver. Avellaneda et al 47 show that there are not significant differences between the two types of thermal boundaries conditions for turbulent low Mach channel flow under asymmetric high temperature gradient. The thermodynamical pressure, P 0 , is 10 bars.…”
Section: Study Configuration a Channel Flow Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TrioCFD software 50 is used to perform the simulations. This code has been developed by the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission and has been used in many simulations of fluid flows 4,5,47,[51][52][53] .…”
Section: B Numerical Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is the case of a temperature difference between two isothermal walls, and the other is the case of an isothermal wall and an adiabatic wall, or the case of isothermal-adiabatic (I-A) walls. The first case has been studied by several groups using DNS or large-eddy simulations, and most of them have focused on the nearly incompressible situations (Wang & Pletcher 1996;Lessani & Papalexandris 2008;Nagata & Nagaoka 2017;Ma, Yang & Ihme 2018;Avellaneda et al 2021), which are believed to be closely related to the flow characteristics in solar receivers (Serra et al 2012;Avellaneda, Bataille & Toutant 2019;Toki, Teramoto & Okamoto 2020). For the fully compressible situations with Ma > 0.3, studies are rather scarce, and they were carried out mainly to serve as a comparison object for the latter I-A cases (Tamano & Morinishi 2006;Baranwal, Donzis & Bowersox 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aulery et al (Aulery et al, 2017) This contribution is responsible for around 10% of the total process. Avellaneda et al (Avellaneda et al, 2019) discussed the local entropy generation rate thanks to DNS performed at mean friction Reynolds from 150 to 210, with wall temperature of 293 K and 879 K. The results suggest that an increase in the wall temperature ratio leads to larger entropy generation rates, and to accentuate the asymmetry between the cold wall and the hot wall. The authors notice that the entropy generation rates is always bigger at the cold wall than at the hot wall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%