2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent RCT concluded that a significant reduction in the rate of positive margins and re-excision was demonstrated by PM patients with cavity shaving, bringing level I evidence to cavity shaving after years of persistent debate and changing the surgical management of PM treatment [68]. However, our study demonstrated that cavity shaving should not be routinely conducted in highly selected Chinese breast cancer patients due to the low rate of positive margins after an initial PM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…A recent RCT concluded that a significant reduction in the rate of positive margins and re-excision was demonstrated by PM patients with cavity shaving, bringing level I evidence to cavity shaving after years of persistent debate and changing the surgical management of PM treatment [68]. However, our study demonstrated that cavity shaving should not be routinely conducted in highly selected Chinese breast cancer patients due to the low rate of positive margins after an initial PM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…By identifying factors that are predictive of positive margins, it is hoped that surgeons may be able to alter surgical planning for those select patients who present with some or many such predictors. The surgeon performing lumpectomy on select patients with higher preoperative risk may choose to perform a wider excision at lumpectomy, utilize intraoperative touch prep, or perform additional shave margins to reduce the risk for re-excision [21]. In addition, a patient with a demonstrated higher risk who is hesitant about the option of lumpectomy may choose to undergo traditional mastectomy rather than risk the possibility of a positive margin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Other studies report positive CS rates of 17.4 -50.2% [14,[18][19][20][23][24][25] . CS positivity has been shown to be associated with younger age, tumour type, size and grade, extensive intraductal component, multifocality and axillary node status [14,19,20,23] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%