Do admission criteria for teacher education institutions matter? A comparative study on beliefs of student teachers from Serbia and Slovenia about inclusive practices

Abstract

The relationship between admissions criteria, the preparation provided by teacher education programmes and student teachers' (STs) beliefs about inclusive education (IE) are rarely made explicit. The paucity of data regarding this relationship leads us to question whether teacher candidates' prior beliefs matter relative to admissions criteria or whether it can be assumed that all of the needed competencies and positive beliefs about teaching well will be acquired during the teacher education programme. To investigate these questions, this study focuses on STs enrolled in three teacher education institutions (TEIs): two in Serbia and one in Slovenia. The study indicates that STs' beliefs about IE relate more to differences in the educational systems and the influences of societies as a whole than to admissions criteria for TEIs. Implications of the study for teacher education and admissions criteria are discussed.

A Case Study from the Perspective of Rural Areas in Bangladesh Concerning “Additional Financial Aid” and “Support for Students”

“…Even if this is insufficient, the fourth stage should include counsel from an external institution, whose network is often limited to metropolitan centers. The fifth step is implementing a routing process in compliance with the law (Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, 2011).The observation has corroborated the findings of several studies highlighting the insufficiencies in teacher training for working in diverse environments (Lesar & ŽvegličMihelič, 2020;Peček & Macura-Milovanović, 2015, 2019.…”

Vpliv sistemske organiziranosti izobraževanja oseb s posebnimi potrebami na inkluzivno naravnanost učnih skupnosti

“…( 2019) med pomembne ovire pri vzpostavljanju inkluzije v Sloveniji uvrščajo sistem študija bodočih pedagoških delavcev, ki je dvotiren ter loči študij specialne in rehabilitacijske pedagogike od splošnih pedagoških programov. Nekateri avtorji (Lesar, 2018;Messner idr., 2016;Peček in Macura-Milovanović, 2015) ugotavljajo, da so v splošnih pedagoških programih sicer teme izobraževanja oseb s posebnimi potrebami v primerjavi z ostalimi ranljivimi skupinami zastopane v večjem deležu, vprašanje pa je, ali pomenijo tudi odmik od medicinskega diskurza in diskurzov nezmožnosti o osebah s posebnimi potrebami k diskurzu demokratizma in pedagoškemu diskurzu, kjer na vse gledamo kot zmožne učenja (Lesar, 2009;Rebolj, 2018) ter prave participacije (Kodele, 2017). Še večji manko pa se kaže na ravni univerzitetnih pedagoških delavcev.…”

Should standardized testing define our profession?

“…Instead of focusing on blocking potential teachers from entering the field, these approaches to admissions aim to identify beliefs and dispositions that are likely to be problematic in the teaching environment and that those future teachers may need to change (DiGiacinto, Bulger, & Wayda, 2017). For example, admissions committees might ask candidates about their beliefs regarding inclusive education — if candidates respond by asserting that, say, dyslexic students cannot succeed in general education classrooms, this shouldn’t necessarily exclude them from the teacher education program (Pecek & Macura-Milovanovic, 2015); rather, it should be taken as an indication of what those candidates will have to learn about inclusive instruction to be effective teachers.…”