Do bats use scent cues from guano and urine to find roosts?

Abstract

Selection of habitat is a key determinant of reproductive success, and the process of finding and choosing these sites is often influenced by the presence of conspecifics. Many bats frequently switch roosts, and some bats repeatedly find new roosts. To find roosts with conspecifics or group members, bats can use social cues. However, most research on how bats use social cues for roost-finding has focused on acoustic cues. Here, we review and discuss the evidence for bat roost selection using scent cues from guano and urine stains, which are present at most bat roosts. We outline reasons why bats might, or might not, use scent in roost detection and selection, and we review evidence on the possible use of guano and urine in roost-finding from eight studies with 12 bat species (across four families). Overall, the sparse evidence that exists indicates that scent cues from guano and urine are not a strong and consistent lure in the species and situations that were tested. Most studies had unclear results or found no effect. Two of the eight studies found weak experimental evidence for bats using guano or urine to select a roosting site. Even if guano and urine can indicate the presence of bats at a roost, it is possible that the resulting olfactory cues do not contain sufficient social information to be used in roost selection, in contrast to olfactory cues from scent marking. Studies of how bats use sensory cues beyond sound could contribute to a better understanding of bat social behavior and roosting ecology.

Modern building structures are a landscape-level driver of bat-human exposure risk in Kenya

“…Synanthropic free-tailed bat species are highly aggregative and use social cues to locate existing roosts 27 . Modern-build structures typically have more spaces for bats to roost and can support higher densities of individuals.…”

A multisensory approach to understanding bat responses to wind energy developments

“…The use of odour maps to navigate may be widespread in birds (Gagliardo 2013), although there is still some debate about the exact olfactory navigation mechanisms used (Walcott et al 2018). Some migratory bats, such as Tadarida brasiliensis, are well known for their strong-smelling roosts (Nielsen et al 2006), which could serve for locating roosts (Englert & Greene 2009, Brown & Carter 2022 or a long-range cue for homing. The effective distances of these olfactory cues are unknown, and the olfactory sensitivity of insectivorous bats may be insufficient to detect low odour concentrations at long distances (Barton et al 1995, Hutcheon et al 2002) (Fig.…”

“…Some migratory bats, such as Tadarida brasiliensis , are well known for their strong‐smelling roosts (Nielsen et al. 2006), which could serve for locating roosts (Englert & Greene 2009, Brown & Carter 2022) or a long‐range cue for homing. The effective distances of these olfactory cues are unknown, and the olfactory sensitivity of insectivorous bats may be insufficient to detect low odour concentrations at long distances (Barton et al.…”

Improving the science and practice of using artificial roosts for bats

“…Calls of conspecifics broadcast near artificial roosts increase bat activity (i.e., acoustic or recorded flight behavior) compared with control sites; however, artificial roost uptake is not affected by use of an acoustic lure (Brokaw, 2015). Further, guano and urine olfactory cues are generally ineffective for attracting bats to roost sites (Brown & Carter, 2022). We have much to learn about the context of bat social calls and olfactory signals.…”