2005
DOI: 10.1002/cb.28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do brands of a feather flock together? Some exploratory findings on the role of individual brands in brand constellation choice

Abstract: In this paper, consumers' choice of brand constellations (eg Big Mac and Coke at McDonald's) are investigated by examining the roles of individual brands. The author proposes that marketers need to look beyond perceived fit between brands within a brand constellation. Therefore, this paper explores empirically how individual brand evaluations at product level and at brand level affect brand constellation choice. It is shown that brands do not have to be equally attractive in order to be included in brand const… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of Solomon and Assael’s (1987) distinct focus on symbolic complementarity and the enactment of social roles through consumption objects, the contemporary view in consumer marketing interprets the consumers’ choice of one or a set of products as a response for an immediate goal-fulfilment (Lange, 2005). As such, early research on brand constellations can be understood to have taken the marketer’s perspective, and the issue of how consumers themselves interact with and create brand constellations instead emerged within consumer research quite recently (cf.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of Solomon and Assael’s (1987) distinct focus on symbolic complementarity and the enactment of social roles through consumption objects, the contemporary view in consumer marketing interprets the consumers’ choice of one or a set of products as a response for an immediate goal-fulfilment (Lange, 2005). As such, early research on brand constellations can be understood to have taken the marketer’s perspective, and the issue of how consumers themselves interact with and create brand constellations instead emerged within consumer research quite recently (cf.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first few seconds of viewing a website are therefore critical for gaining a consumer's attention, and establishing a virtual store presence which is consistent with the consumer's brand image for the online site (Halliburton and Ziegfeld, 2009). Consumers categorise or position brands based on multiple factors, often seeing them in groups or constellations (Lange, 2005), and in a similar fashion, when they gather initial impressions of websites, they categorise or position those also. Therefore, the goal of this research is to gain insight as to how consumers initially view websites -as images rather than 'clickable' interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The human propensity to categorize stimuli around such schema has been applied in social studies to account for stereotyping, political attitudes, and group decision making. Within an information processing framework, the principles of categorization have been applied to theories of consumer choice (Bettman, 1979), brand image transfer (Mittal and Tsiros, 1995), brand complementarities (Lange, 2005), and brand extension (Shen, Bei, and Chu, 2011). In sharp contrast to traditional cognitive research, the current theoretical effort in the field integrates the affect and cognition components of human cognition (Fiske and Pavelchak, 1986;Sujan and Bettman, 1989).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other studies (Ross and Murphy, 1999) point to the consistency of taxonomic categories that cannot be obtained using goal-driven categorization. Lange (2005) argues that goal-derived categories are more suitable than taxonomy-derived categories when applied to brand complementarities.…”
Section: Categorization In the Marketing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%