2020
DOI: 10.1057/s41269-020-00159-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do campaign posters trigger voting based on looks? Probing an explanation for why good-looking candidates win more votes

Abstract: Numerous studies document that better-looking candidates win more votes. Yet the causal mechanisms leading to this advantage remain unexplored. We consider for the first time a potential trigger of the looks-vote association that has previously been suggested but not tested in the literature: exposure to campaign posters of the candidates. We test this explanation with German election survey data, which we augment with ratings-provided by MTurk workers from the U.S.-of the attractiveness and facial competence … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To achieve a more salient gender manipulation, we added images to the interview. We used election campaign images showing German politicians from a database that contained information regarding the politicians' ages and attractiveness ratings (Herrmann & Shikano, 2021). We selected six images (three men, three women) of middle-aged, white politicians of medium attractiveness (M = 4.5 on a 10-point scale).…”
Section: Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve a more salient gender manipulation, we added images to the interview. We used election campaign images showing German politicians from a database that contained information regarding the politicians' ages and attractiveness ratings (Herrmann & Shikano, 2021). We selected six images (three men, three women) of middle-aged, white politicians of medium attractiveness (M = 4.5 on a 10-point scale).…”
Section: Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following a line of psychological research that indicates that people frequently judge unknown individuals based on appearance, with attractiveness being associated with impressions of competence, there is a growing literature analyzing the importance of candidates' physical appearance on electoral outcomes. In particular, people infer competence, trustworthiness, and intelligence only from facial features (Zebrowitz et al 2002), producing inferences about political traits from appearance that are often biased (Herrmann and Shikano 2016). Todorov et al (2005) show that voters will use appearance to infer competence, intelligence, leadership, trustworthiness, charisma, and likeability -ultimately influencing their propensity to vote for these candidates.…”
Section: Literature On Appearance and Ballot Affectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Lawson et al (2010) conducted a series of studies using pictures of candidates in Brazil and Mexico, which found that the importance of appearance as a predictor of candidates' success is greater in the context of candidate-centered voting and in low information environments. 2 The effect of candidate appearance has also been shown to depend on the availability of information about appearance, for example, increasing when voters are subject to extensive use of candidate campaign posters (Herrmann and Shikano 2020). In countries where photographs appear directly on the ballot, there is even more opportunity to judge candidates on appearance (Banducci et al 2008;Lawson et al 2010).…”
Section: Literature On Appearance and Ballot Affectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Posters have been considered the most effective campaigning tool for candidates for regional heads to attract people's hearts to vote for them in the upcoming elections. So far, campaign posters are still the best way to introduce potential election campaign participants (Herrmann & Shikano, 2021). The language used on the poster is made as attractive as possible so that the information conveyed can be received and implemented properly (Dyatmika & Afnan, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%