2023
DOI: 10.1080/25740881.2023.2175222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Carboxymethyl Cellulose and Pal-KTTKS Make Bacterial Cellulose a Superior Wound Dressing or Skin Scaffold?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 66 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, hydrophilic functional groups in the CMC structure improve BC water absorption properties by facilitating the water molecules' diffusion inside its network [5]. However, a specific CMC concentration in the BC structure led to a dense network with less porosity than the controlled one and reduced BC water absorption [7,8]. Other BC in-situ modification limitations are some additives' antibacterial activity against BC-producing strains and some additives' insolubility or low suspension stability in the culture medium [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, hydrophilic functional groups in the CMC structure improve BC water absorption properties by facilitating the water molecules' diffusion inside its network [5]. However, a specific CMC concentration in the BC structure led to a dense network with less porosity than the controlled one and reduced BC water absorption [7,8]. Other BC in-situ modification limitations are some additives' antibacterial activity against BC-producing strains and some additives' insolubility or low suspension stability in the culture medium [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%