1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-5371(96)00011-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do children affect the labor supply of Swedish men? Time diary vs. survey data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 The double hurdle specification allows for the possibility of different factors affecting the two decisions as well as the same explanatory variables having different impacts on each of the two hurdles. This class of models has been applied extensively to analysis of the consumption of goods (for an overview, see Wodajo 2007: 16) and is well accepted in labour supply estimation (Carlin and Flood 1997;.…”
Section: Data Analysis: the Double Hurdle Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The double hurdle specification allows for the possibility of different factors affecting the two decisions as well as the same explanatory variables having different impacts on each of the two hurdles. This class of models has been applied extensively to analysis of the consumption of goods (for an overview, see Wodajo 2007: 16) and is well accepted in labour supply estimation (Carlin and Flood 1997;.…”
Section: Data Analysis: the Double Hurdle Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 This model is particularly suited for the analysis of time use data, where zeros may originate from different sources: for instance, occurrence of an atypical event in a diary date or from a different process determining the decision to participate in a certain activity. It is recognized in the literature (see, for example, Carlin and Flood 1997;Daunfeldt and Hellström 2007, and the references therein) that the method of time diary data collection results in too many individuals reporting zero minutes of time spent on certain activities, especially if they are performed occasionally (such as religious activities in our case). On the other hand, there may be a different stochastic behavioral process determining the participation decision in a certain activity.…”
Section: Econometric Methodologymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In contrast, Jones (1992) advocates the use of the exclusion restrictions in the dependent double-hurdle model. While it is very difficult to find credible instrumental variables for all three uses of time, we have experimented with both specifications, using diary days and season dummies as exclusion restrictions, following Carlin and Flood (1997). Since the results from the models with exclusion restrictions were qualitatively identical and quantitatively similar to the one without exclusion restrictions and since there are still some doubts on the validity of the instruments, we decided to report the latter.…”
Section: Econometric Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, his study shows that the time-use data collection method strongly influences the estimates of wage rate effects on labour supply, especially when weekend work is taken into account. Likewise, Carlin and Flood's (1997) comparison of time-diary versus survey data on how children affect the labour supply of Swedish men reveals that conventional survey data conceal any effect of the number and age of children on these males' labour supply, whereas the time-diary data show that children strongly influence male labour supply and significantly reduce the work hours by 2.6-3.4 h per week. 3…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%