2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2018.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do clientelistic machines affect electoral outcomes? Mayoral incumbency as a proxy for machine prowess

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Stokes et al (2013) indicate, these mechanisms have lost effectiveness as reforms for the transparency of electoral processes and polling booth secrecy have gained traction, generating an increasingly less opaque vote. However, due to the refinement of research methods, an incipient literature has emerged that maintains that the harvesting of votes through clientelist practices is limited (Kramon 2016;Núñez 2018;Cantú 2019). These studies pay attention to the electoral advantage obtained by purchasing votes.…”
Section: Party-elector Linkage and Electoral Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As Stokes et al (2013) indicate, these mechanisms have lost effectiveness as reforms for the transparency of electoral processes and polling booth secrecy have gained traction, generating an increasingly less opaque vote. However, due to the refinement of research methods, an incipient literature has emerged that maintains that the harvesting of votes through clientelist practices is limited (Kramon 2016;Núñez 2018;Cantú 2019). These studies pay attention to the electoral advantage obtained by purchasing votes.…”
Section: Party-elector Linkage and Electoral Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know that incumbents enjoy the benefits of the post and are better placed than a challenger to build networks of intermediaries. However, we have less evidence about how this type of clientelist practice impacts citizens' electoral turnout (Nichter 2008;Gans-Morse et al 2009;Szwarcberg 2012) and incumbents' electoral performance (Zittel 2015;Núñez 2018;Lucas 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In developing democracies, such as those in Latin America, money in politics also finances illicit political activities. Off-the-books payments to voters in exchange for their votes are common before elections (see, e.g., Cantú, 2019; Gingerich, 2014; Stokes, 2005), even though the literature on clientelism rarely studies how politicians finance it (Gingerich, 2013; but see Núñez, 2018). 5 Furthermore, electoral campaigns in Argentina and other developing democracies also rely heavily on on-the-ground services that are paid in cash.…”
Section: The Expenses Of Professional Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along these lines, a number of electoral RD studies in political science have investigated how the effect of incumbency varies conditional upon the characteristics of the candidate, party, or local context Lopes da Fonseca, 2017;Núñez, 2018;. For instance, finds a stark gender gap in candidates' persistence after losing an election at the local level in California: losing an election decreases the chance of running again by 50% more for women than it does for men, although this gender gap may attenuate in more senior electoral settings .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%