2020
DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2021.1966176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do comment letters from the stock exchanges have governance effect on R&D manipulation?

Abstract: As an important reform of supervision, the comment letter mechanism adopted by the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange has been paid much attention by regulators and academics. Taking Chinese A-share listed firms from 2015 to 2018 as our samples, this paper investigates the impact of comment letters on companies' R&D manipulation. Our empirical results show that R&D-related comment letters can effectively reduce companies' R&D manipulation. Further tests show that the more timely the commen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effective corporate governance can help prevent R&D manipulation. An internationalized board of directors [53], accounting conservatism [14,54], the moderating role of political connections [55], analyst concern [56,57], and managerial and academic experience [58,59] can all play a role in inhibiting R&D manipulation from a corporate governance perspective. In addition, government regulation may provide a means to inhibit R&D manipulation [17,60].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective corporate governance can help prevent R&D manipulation. An internationalized board of directors [53], accounting conservatism [14,54], the moderating role of political connections [55], analyst concern [56,57], and managerial and academic experience [58,59] can all play a role in inhibiting R&D manipulation from a corporate governance perspective. In addition, government regulation may provide a means to inhibit R&D manipulation [17,60].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%