Do Compactness and Poly-Centricity Mitigate PM10 Emissions? Evidence from Yangtze River Delta Area

Abstract

The Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region is one of the most densely populated and economically developed areas in China, which provides an ideal environment with which to study the various strategies, such as compact and polycentric development advocated by researchers to reduce air pollution. Using the data of YRD cities from 2011–2017, the spatial durbin model (SDM) is presented to investigate how compactness (in terms of urban density, jobs-housing balance, and urban centralization) and poly-centricity (in terms of the number of centers and polycentric cluster) affect PM10 emissions. After controlling some variables, the results suggest that more jobs-housing-balanced and centralized compactness tends to decrease emissions, while poly-centricity by developing too many centers is expected to result in more pollutant emissions. The effect of high-density compactness is more controversial. In addition, for cities with more private car ownerships (>10 million within cities), enhancing the polycentric cluster by achieving a more balanced population distribution between the traditional centers and sub-centers could reduce emissions, whereas this mitigated emissions effect may be limited. The difference between our study and western studies suggests that the correlation between high-density compactness and air pollution vary with the specific characteristics and with spatial planning implications, as this paper concludes.

Understanding The Consequences of a City’s Spatial Structure through its Density Profile as Indicator. A Case Study in Manado Municipal, North Sulawesi, Indonesia

“…These notion is inline with the findings of other study that shows monocentric spatial structure has higher environmental efficiency than the polycentric spatial structure, unless the population density is beyond 280 persons/km2 (Ye et al, 2022). Some researchs show that monocentric structure can produce agglomeration effects (Yuan et al, 2018;Han et al, 2020), and also improves resource efficiency and reducing environmental pollution (Tao et al, 2019;Zhao et al, 2019). A city with a monocentric structure is seen as having several advantages.…”

Spatial analysis of urban sprawling with an emphasis on ecological infrastructure integrity (Case study: Miandoab City)

“…Such as internal development inside legal urban boundaries, compact growth, and smart growth. These policies have aimed to create compacter, more flexible cities, away from the problems of the modern city, while at the same time protecting the landscape (especially the ecological infrastructure) and the urban community vitality (Abdullahi & Pradhan, 2017;Artmann et al, 2019;Lee & Lim, 2018;Mehrafzun et al, 2019;Tao et al, 2019;Tappert et al, 2018). For responding the landscape changes and increasing the urban ecological infrastructure integrity, solutions can be presented in the form of three types of strategies.…”

Forecasting Sustainable Development Indicators in Romania: A Study in the European Context

“…Thus, the importance of identifying the balance between the economic, social and ecological domains is all the more obvious in the context of population growth and diminishing resources, researching energy consumption and renewable sources [51][52][53], pollution [54,55], poverty [56,57], education [58,59], etc.…”