2012
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(12)61030-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Countries or Hospitals With Longer Stays Have Lower Readmission Rates? Findings From the Ascend-Hf Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
43
4
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
43
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While population-level trends demonstrate an increased risk of readmission contemporaneous with reduced length of stay 25 and countries with longer length of stay tend to have reduced readmission rates, 26 we found greater length of stay was associated with an increased hazard for readmission. In this case, greater length of stay may represent greater HF disease severity, greater complexity of the AHF episode, greater overall burden of comorbidity, socioeconomic barriers to safe hospital discharge, or simply reflect practice patterns that differ by geographic location.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…While population-level trends demonstrate an increased risk of readmission contemporaneous with reduced length of stay 25 and countries with longer length of stay tend to have reduced readmission rates, 26 we found greater length of stay was associated with an increased hazard for readmission. In this case, greater length of stay may represent greater HF disease severity, greater complexity of the AHF episode, greater overall burden of comorbidity, socioeconomic barriers to safe hospital discharge, or simply reflect practice patterns that differ by geographic location.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…While the absolute rates were higher for both outcomes in our cohort within each HFRS stratum than in the UK data,5 differences in hospital use patterns and postdischarge outcomes are common between countries,13 and the important finding was the similar gradient of risk across HFRS strata. Thus, we have validated the generalisability of the HFRS (for the outcomes of prolonged hospital LOS or 30-day mortality) in a different healthcare system, geographical region and time period from where it was derived and initially validated.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The ASTRONAUT trial population was notable for inclusion of >25% of patients from Asian/Pacific countries. To our knowledge, we present the first data on post‐discharge outcomes beyond 30 days for HHF patients from India, Phillipines, Singapore, Turkey, and Taiwan . Compared with North Americans, ASTRONAUT patients from these countries carried substantially greater risk of post‐discharge death at 6‐ and 12‐month follow‐up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In this respect, there is growing recognition of geographic variation in HF patient profiles and the interplay with increasing globalization of clinical trials . Despite comprehensive inclusion and exclusion criteria, wide variation in patient characteristics by geographic region has been well documented in previous studies . Likewise, region of origin has been shown to be an independent predictor of clinical outcomes following adjustment for patient risk factors and therapy .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%