Do differences in national cultures affect cross-country financial statement comparability under IFRS?

Abstract

I examine whether managers in different countries apply the same accounting standards dissimilarly when they come from different cultural backgrounds. I look at the cultural dimensions of trust towards others, materialism, and risk aversion because previous studies find that these characteristics affect reporting outcomes within the US. Evidence from various academic disciplines suggest that cultural beliefs and values affect individuals' estimates and judgments and their consequent decisions, including economic and financial decisions. I posit that certain cultural beliefs and values also affect the estimates and judgments of corporate managers, resulting in inconsistent reporting decisions for given economic events. The inconsistent reporting decisions can cause the same underlying economic events to be reported differently or different underlying economic events to be reported identically (i.e. even when two firms' financial statements show the same profit, one firm may have a higher actual economic profit if the managers in that firm were more careful and thorough in reporting expenses). When the same numbers in the financial statements reflect different underlying economics or different numbers reflect the same underlying economics, it will be harder for users of financial statements to compare firms' actual values (i.e. financial statements are less comparable, or have low comparability). I find that firms from two countries have lower financial statement comparability when there are greater cultural differences in trust towards others, materialism, and risk aversion. I also find weak evidence that stronger enforcement of compliance with accounting rules mitigates the cultural effects on crosscountry financial statement comparability. Stronger enforcement of regulations and law does not mitigate the cultural effects. These findings suggest that having a strong accounting compliance, regulatory, or legal enforcement does not effectively address the impact of culture on crosscountry financial statement comparability. A possible explanation is that cultural influence on financial reporting is also manifested through enforcement officials; in other words, those in charge of the

Resistive factors of delaying IFRS adoption in Saudi Arabia listed firms

“…(1) investigating the impact of cultural factors on financial statements under IFRS is significant since the huge empirical evidence from prior studies that focussed on other fields documented that the cultural difference over countries affected individual and firms' decisions (Chung, 2017;Zingales, 2015;Xu, 2014); and (2) exploring more immeasurable variables that could affect IFRS adoption, as most of the prior literature focussed on measurable variables.…”

“…Based on the aforementioned discussion that related to the cultural factors, there are several studies focussed on accounting, since they believed that cultural factors have a serious impact on countries’ economics and firm performance. Culture could be a particularly important issue to accounting researchers according to two aims: investigating the impact of cultural factors on financial statements under IFRS is significant since the huge empirical evidence from prior studies that focussed on other fields documented that the cultural difference over countries affected individual and firms’ decisions (Chung, 2017; Zingales, 2015; Xu, 2014); and exploring more immeasurable variables that could affect IFRS adoption, as most of the prior literature focussed on measurable variables. …”

Moderating Influence of Idiosyncratic Diversity on the Relationship between Accounting Ethics and Financial Reporting Quality

“…Extant literature is replete with positive findings on intra-national diversity management and financial reporting quality (Hoang et al, 2015;Labelle et al, 2010) The relationship between cross-national diversity management and financial reporting quality is mixed. While some are positive and significant (Chung, 2017;Hashim, 2012;Lainez & Callao, 2000), there also exists a report of negative relationships (Alfiero et al, 2018).…”

Institutional Characteristics and the Faithful Representation of Financial Reporting of Selected Listed Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria

“…This differences made comparability of accounting information difficult which hindered the flow of capital across borders (Olaoye&Aguguom, 2017). Despite the efforts to adopt a common set of accounting standard, the problem of comparability of financial reports still persists (Chung, 2017;Mbobo&Ekpo, 2016). This therefore can impede the flow of cross border investments and limit the economic activities or growth of firms.…”