2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10926-018-9819-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Differences in Work Disability Duration Between Men and Women Vary by Province in Canada?

Abstract: Purpose Research has shown that there are important sex and gender-based differences in the work disability duration of men and women. This research is often limited to single jurisdictions, using different outcome measures, and therefore has limited generalisability of findings. This study examined if differences between work disability of men and women differed by province and by duration of work disability. Methods Cohorts of injured workers in the Canadian provinces of Bri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the WSIB group tended to be comprised of males, which is consistent with the distribution of WSIB claims; for example, between 2006 and 2016, males represented 57-64% of all WSIB claims (21). Similar distributions have been reported in other provinces (22). The age distribution across all WSIB claims within the same time frame, however, is different.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In this study, the WSIB group tended to be comprised of males, which is consistent with the distribution of WSIB claims; for example, between 2006 and 2016, males represented 57-64% of all WSIB claims (21). Similar distributions have been reported in other provinces (22). The age distribution across all WSIB claims within the same time frame, however, is different.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This effect was likely attributable to the lower likelihood of sustainable RTW for women who were not provided with GRTW over the longest disability durations, as shown in other studies. [37][38][39] By industry, larger effects were found for the Table 3 Adjusted quantile regression for differences in time-loss days until full sustainable RTW 1 year after the first time-loss day,* by gender…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary outcome was work disability days defined by the total number of calendar days while on an accepted short-term disability workers' compensation claim from the date of injury to the date of claim closure, with a follow-up period capped at 365 days. This measure differs from paid wage-replacement days used in other research when detailed return to work (RTW) data are unavailable [49,50] and represents an appropriate measure of the overall burden of work disability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%