Do direct-democratic procedures lead to higher acceptance than political representation?

Abstract

Are direct-democratic decisions more acceptable to voters than decisions arrived at through representative procedures? We conduct an experimental online vignette study with a German sample to investigate how voters' acceptance of a political decision depends on the process through which it is reached. For a set of different issues, we investigate how acceptance varies depending on whether the decision is the result of a direct-democratic institution, a party in a representative democracy, or an expert committee. Our results show that for important issues, direct democracy generates greater acceptance; this finding holds particularly for those voters who do not agree with a collectively chosen outcome. However, if the topic is of limited importance to the voters, acceptance does not differ between the mechanisms. Our results imply that a combination of representative democracy and direct democracy, conditional on the distribution of issue importance among the electorate, may be optimal with regard to acceptance of political decisions.Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article

The Winner Takes It All: Revisiting the Effect of Direct Democracy on Citizens’ Political Support

“…A recent study in Sweden showed that following a decision on a contested issue using a representative decision-making process, decision losers became less supporting of the political system and this negative effect proved to be remarkably stable over time (Esaiasson et al in press). A recent study that explicitly compares direct and representative processes further corroborates this conclusion (Towfigh et al 2016).…”

Keeping Humans in the Loop: Pooling Knowledge through Artificial Swarm Intelligence to Improve Business Decision Making

“…For important issues, decision acceptance is greater with direct participation. 88 Increased legitimacy and acceptance of decisions is associated with improved motivation and performance. 89 A lowquality solution that has good acceptance can be more effective than a higherquality solution that lacks acceptance.…”

Legislative Party Polarization and Trust in State Legislatures

“…When the processes governing political outcomes become contorted or manipulated, trust in government ought to decline. This process-oriented perspective is supported by more recent work on the relationship between scandals and trust (Bowler & Karp, 2004;Chanley, Rudolph, & Rahn, 2000;Orren, 1997), and citizens' level of involvement in the democratic process (Towfigh et al, 2016). Recent work on ideological polarization in legislatures has painted a picture of real distortion in governing processes (Lee, 2015).…”