2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10802-021-00813-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Distinct Groups of Reactively and Proactively Aggressive Children Exist? A Confirmatory Latent Profile Approach

Abstract: The present study examined whether there are distinct groups of children with reactive versus proactive motives for their aggressive behavior. We extended previous research by using a person-based analytical approach on data from a questionnaire assessing children’s motives independently from the severity of their aggression. Two competing hypotheses were tested. The both subtypes hypothesis holds that both reactive and proactive subtypes exist, as well as a mixed subtype. The reactive only hypothesis holds th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(100 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, relatively high aggressiveness and obvious aggressive behavior in children may affect the development of their attention, reduce academic performance, and produce negative emotions [3][4][5]. On the other hand, aggressive behavior is closely related to peer victimization and bullying [6]. People involved in bullying may have more internalizing problems, and even develop suicidal ideation [7], resulting in more serious consequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, relatively high aggressiveness and obvious aggressive behavior in children may affect the development of their attention, reduce academic performance, and produce negative emotions [3][4][5]. On the other hand, aggressive behavior is closely related to peer victimization and bullying [6]. People involved in bullying may have more internalizing problems, and even develop suicidal ideation [7], resulting in more serious consequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, to assess individual differences in children's aggressive SIP, we designed different social scenarios to assess both reactive and proactive aggression (Dodge, 1991). Reactive aggression is defined as an impulsive aggressive response to perceived threat or provocation, whereas proactive aggression is defined as planned aggressive behaviour aimed at obtaining a desired outcome (Dodge, 1991; Hubbard et al, 2010; Van Dijk et al, 2021). This suggests that different social contexts are needed to assess these types of aggression and their underlying SIP patterns, such as peer provocation for reactive SIP and the opportunity to obtain instrumental gain for proactive SIP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
variable-based approach [5,6], it remains unclear whether this distinction can be useful for scientific and clinical practice [2,7]. Some researchers argue that unique correlates or precursors do not necessarily reflects the existence of different groups of aggressive individuals [8,9]. Thus, the identification of different subtypes of aggressive children and adolescents from a person-based approach becomes relevant to inform effective interventions tailored to their specific needs [1,10].
RA and PA from a Variable-Based ApproachThe distinctiveness of RA and PA has been supported by several variable-based studies, mainly through factor analysis and differential correlates [6,11,12].
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%