2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11266-015-9567-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Donors Care About the Price of Giving? A Review of the Evidence, with Some Theory to Organise It

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the independent variables of the economic model of giving (Weisbrod & Dominguez, 1986), we operationalized lnPrice i , t as the cost to a donor of purchasing one dollar of output for an organization's beneficiaries. We measured it as 1italicprogram expenses:italictotal expenses and it took into account that the nonprofit could devote resources to programs only after incurring expenditures on fundraising and general administration (Trussel & Parsons, 2008; Wong & Ortmann, 2016). In their literature review, Jacobs and Marudas (2009) highlighted a substantial amount of evidence that shows price is negatively associated with donations to the United States, United Kingdom, and Canadian nonprofits.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the independent variables of the economic model of giving (Weisbrod & Dominguez, 1986), we operationalized lnPrice i , t as the cost to a donor of purchasing one dollar of output for an organization's beneficiaries. We measured it as 1italicprogram expenses:italictotal expenses and it took into account that the nonprofit could devote resources to programs only after incurring expenditures on fundraising and general administration (Trussel & Parsons, 2008; Wong & Ortmann, 2016). In their literature review, Jacobs and Marudas (2009) highlighted a substantial amount of evidence that shows price is negatively associated with donations to the United States, United Kingdom, and Canadian nonprofits.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, donors may view organizational expenditure on fundraising as a diversion of resources from programs, thus increasing the perceived price of program spending (Ashley & Faulk, 2010; Gneezy, Keenan, & Gneezy, 2014). Lastly, donors care about the price of their contributions because they want their donations to maximize charitable output (Wong & Ortmann, 2016). To gain better evidence of the factors that affect donations, Jacobs and Marudas (2009) suggested that the model should consider the combined effect of price and administrative expenses because this approach reduces the problem of omitting correlated variables of efficiency/inefficiency.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to the shortcomings of organizational-level studies, scholars have increasingly focused on the impact of financial ratios on giving from an individual-level perspective, and done so through either survey or experimental methods. The second relevant stream therefore constitutes a more practitioner-oriented set of survey studies conducted to capture donor expectations toward financial ratios and their relevance for giving decisions (for a recent review,see Wong & Ortmann, 2016). Overall, surveys have delivered mixed results (Bagwell et al, 2013; Barclays Wealth, 2010; Grey Matter Research, 2018).…”
Section: Background and Prior Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, higher administrative costs ratios signal higher levels of inefficiency and waste, which are perceived negatively by donors and other constituents such as donors and watchdog organizations. Gneezy et al (2014) termed this phenomenon “overhead aversion.” Indeed, empirical research documents that nonprofits with high levels of administrative costs ratios receive less private donations and constituent support (Bowman, 2006; Sloan, 2009; Tinkelman & Mankaney, 2007; Wong & Ortmann, 2016).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of both studies determined that their findings were inconclusive and called for more future research. However, to our knowledge, there are no later empirical studies that address the relationship between nonprofits’ administrative costs and government funding, even though the research on nonprofit overhead costs and efficiency ratios has flourished in recent years (e.g., Charles, 2018; Ecer et al, 2017; Gneezy et al, 2014; Parsons et al, 2017; Wong & Ortmann, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%