2015
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do early warning indicators consistently predict nonlinear change in long‐term ecological data?

Abstract: Daunt, Francis. 2016. Do early warning indicators consistently predict nonlinear change in longterm ecological data? Journal of Applied Ecology, 53 (3). 666-676. 10.1111/1365-2664.12519 Contact CEH NORA team at noraceh@ceh.ac.ukThe NERC and CEH trademarks and logos ('the Trademarks') are registered trademarks of NERC in the UK and other countries, and may not be used without the prior written consent of the Trademark owner.Page | 1 2. We tested whether long term abundance time series of 55 taxa (126 data s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
111
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(135 reference statements)
9
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are in line with results from an assessment of the detectability of EWIs before nonlinear transitions (43). Although it is encouraging that we could detect EWIs in some of our empirical aquatic time series using data derived from commonly used monitoring schemes that were not designed for this purpose, the lack of reliability and agreement among signals limits the potential application of EWIs only to well-understood ecosystems (35).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Our findings are in line with results from an assessment of the detectability of EWIs before nonlinear transitions (43). Although it is encouraging that we could detect EWIs in some of our empirical aquatic time series using data derived from commonly used monitoring schemes that were not designed for this purpose, the lack of reliability and agreement among signals limits the potential application of EWIs only to well-understood ecosystems (35).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Collectively, experiments that reveal clear evidence for resilience indicators have used explicit models of the ecosystem processes, detailed measurements tailored to the expected dynamics, and controls or reference ecosystems. In contrast, situations where dynamics are poorly understood, data are collected for another purpose, or reference ecosystems are not available may fail to generate discernible changes in resilience indicators (8). In addition, resilience indicators need to be evaluated under a wider variety of experimental conditions to better understand their efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification, drivers, mechanisms, and potential reversibility of regime shifts are debated and vary among ecosystems (6)(7)(8). Nonetheless, regime shifts in ecosystems warrant further research due to their massive consequences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al 2015). Ecological studies have reached similar conclusions, identifying a need to apply resilience metrics to multiple indicators and to consider resilience at species and ecosystem levels in order to derive more robust assessments (Angeler & Craig 2016, Burthe et al 2016). …”
Section: Defining Resiliencementioning
confidence: 93%