2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do EITC expansions pay for themselves? Effects on tax revenue and government transfers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
22
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
14
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(p-values < 0.001) and are largely consistent with previous evidence on how the EITC aects unmarried and married mothers (Eissa and Hoynes, 2006;Bastian and Jones, 2019).…”
Section: Labor Supplysupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(p-values < 0.001) and are largely consistent with previous evidence on how the EITC aects unmarried and married mothers (Eissa and Hoynes, 2006;Bastian and Jones, 2019).…”
Section: Labor Supplysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The larger increase in time spent playing for married mothers is also consistent with modest negative impacts of the EITC on their labor supply. While we do not nd a negative eect on the average labor supply of married mothers, we do nd a decrease among younger married mothers in Section 5.7, lining up with previous studies (Eissa and Hoynes, 2004;Bastian and Jones, 2019). a larger impact on weekday relative to weekend time use.…”
Section: Eitc Eects On the Distribution Of Time Usesupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given the potential benefits to society in light of the immense costs of violent crime, the findings suggest a very high marginal value of the public funds, which is in line with evidence by Bastian and Jones (2018) who show that the EITC has largely paid for itself. To further improve our understanding of the relationship between EITC and crime, future research should examine the role of potential mechanisms, such as employment changes, financial security, relative poverty, opportunity costs, mental health, and within‐household domestic violence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%