2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do electron-capture supernovae make neutron stars?

Abstract: Context. In the classical picture, electron-capture supernovae and the accretion-induced collapse of oxygen-neon white dwarfs undergo an oxygen deflagration phase before gravitational collapse produces a neutron star. These types of core collapse events are postulated to explain several astronomical phenomena. In this work, the oxygen deflagration phase is simulated for the first time using multidimensional hydrodynamics. Aims. By simulating the oxygen deflagration with multidimensional hydrodynamics and a lev… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
212
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
4
212
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The light curve will look different from that of canonical AIC (Woosley & Baron 1992;Piro & Kulkarni 2013) or a strippedenvelope electron capture supernova (Moriya & Eldridge 2016), since the envelopes in our models extend out to ∼ a few×100R , and thus produce much brighter light curves. They also look different from regular electroncapture SNe from 8 − 10M stars, due to the much smaller envelope masses, producing shorter light curves that lack hydrogen (Takahashi et al 2013;Smith 2013;Tauris et al 2015;Jones et al 2016 …”
Section: Shock Heating the Envelopesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The light curve will look different from that of canonical AIC (Woosley & Baron 1992;Piro & Kulkarni 2013) or a strippedenvelope electron capture supernova (Moriya & Eldridge 2016), since the envelopes in our models extend out to ∼ a few×100R , and thus produce much brighter light curves. They also look different from regular electroncapture SNe from 8 − 10M stars, due to the much smaller envelope masses, producing shorter light curves that lack hydrogen (Takahashi et al 2013;Smith 2013;Tauris et al 2015;Jones et al 2016 …”
Section: Shock Heating the Envelopesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Hence, the deflagration ashes will likely be buoyant, leading to expansion, which will in turn limit the deleptonization rate. This hypothesis is strongly supported by 3D hydrodynamic simula- tions of ECSN deflagrations by Jones et al (2016Jones et al ( , 2019: their least compact progenitor ingites at log 10 (ρ c /g cm −3 ) = 9.90 but still manages to eject ∼ 1 M of material. Similarly, Marquardt et al (2015) simulate ONe WD detonations at lower densities and demonstrate that the explosion is practically identical to a typical SN Ia.…”
Section: Oxygen Ignition and Thermonuclear Runawaymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In this case, oxygen ignites above log 10 (ρ c /g cm −3 ) 10 and only after 20 Ne electron captures have started to occur at a significant rate. Hence, in the absence of residual carbon, this star would produce a core-collapse or a thermonuclear ECSN (Jones et al 2016).…”
Section: Oxygen Ignition and Thermonuclear Runawaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Extension of simulations to investigation of the boundary between core collapse and thermonuclear explosion of ONe cores (Jones et al 2016), and to the white dwarf merger channel for SNIa and merger in general and common envelope evolution ) is beginning to be made. The resolution issue seems particularly acute for mergers because of the steep gradient at the surface of each star (a boundary problem).…”
Section: Implications For Thermonuclear Supernovaementioning
confidence: 99%