2010
DOI: 10.1080/15305058.2010.508569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Examinees Have Similar Test-Taking Effort? A High-Stakes Question for Low-Stakes Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, the low stakes have been shown to lead to reduced validity and reliability when stu dents are not putting their best effort into the assessment because of the lack of personal consequences. They have also led to underestimated norms in later high-stakes tests on the basis of the results (Barry, Horst, Finney, Brown, & Kopp, 2010;Wise, 2006). The problem of low stakes has been countered by adding to the assessments self-report questions regarding the effort students have invested in the assessment, but the reliability of self-reported effort has been shown to be unreliable because of untruthful responding and not accounting for change in effort along an entire test session (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Yet, the low stakes have been shown to lead to reduced validity and reliability when stu dents are not putting their best effort into the assessment because of the lack of personal consequences. They have also led to underestimated norms in later high-stakes tests on the basis of the results (Barry, Horst, Finney, Brown, & Kopp, 2010;Wise, 2006). The problem of low stakes has been countered by adding to the assessments self-report questions regarding the effort students have invested in the assessment, but the reliability of self-reported effort has been shown to be unreliable because of untruthful responding and not accounting for change in effort along an entire test session (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Examinee effort is on average not only lower in low-stakes assessments compared to high-stakes assessments, but it is also likely to be more variable (Barry et al, 2010). Because examinee effort is related to test performance, and low examinee effort tends to result in a distorted ability estimate, the exerted effort can be a source of construct-irrelevant variance (Haladyna & Downing, 2004 ).…”
Section: Examinee Elfort In Low-stakes Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rnight cause sorne test takers to expend low effort during the assessrnent, which can result in biased and invalid rneasurernents. Therefore, a high-stakes question arises for low-stakes assessrnents (Barry, Horst, Finney, Brown, & Kopp, 2010): Does exarninee effort-and the differences therein-forrn a threat for the validity ofinternational assessrnents?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, three students chose not to take this posttest. Research conducted by Barry et al (2010) shows that test scores may not truly reflect the abilities of examinees in cases when there is little or no personal consequence for the test taker.…”
Section: Pre-and Postcourse Knowledge Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%