2017
DOI: 10.1111/jofo.12194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do extended incubation recesses carry fitness costs in two cavity-nesting birds?

Abstract: Because extended incubation recesses, where incubating songbirds are away from nests for periods much longer than usual, occur infrequently, they have been treated as outliers in most previous studies and thus overlooked. However, egg temperatures can potentially fall below the physiological zero temperature during extended recesses, potentially affecting developing embryos. As such, evaluating extended recesses in an ecological context and identifying their possible fitness effects are important. With this ai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, Bueno‐Enciso et al . ). In our population such extended recesses (exit durations > 60 min, definition following Bueno‐Enciso et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, Bueno‐Enciso et al . ). In our population such extended recesses (exit durations > 60 min, definition following Bueno‐Enciso et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In our population such extended recesses (exit durations > 60 min, definition following Bueno‐Enciso et al . ) represent approximately 10% of all exits (Fig. S7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps breeding in a temperate climate does not require continuous incubation attendance (but see temperate species in Bulla et al 2016b). Essentially, the between nest variability in nest attendance – which can be as much as a 6.5 hours difference per day – seems huge and is much larger than nest attendance fluctuations known to influence embryo development (Hepp et al 2006; Carter et al 2014; Bueno-Enciso et al 2017), or length of the incubation period (Grønstøl 2003; Martin et al 2007; Carter et al 2014; Bueno-Enciso et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Apart from anti-predation strategy and predatory risk, the day-night differences in lapwing nest attendance may arise from circadian variation in ambient temperatures and food availability. First, as ambient temperature falls during the night, continuous incubation might be necessary to sustain embryonic development 45 , 46 . Indeed, also other species (including the uniparental ones) increase their night-time nest attendance 24 , 68 , 69 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%