1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002650050463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do female black-capped chickadees prefer high-ranking males as extra-pair partners?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
119
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
119
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A small number of individuals from geographically distant populations (AKA and NL) were screened using 20 microsatellite primer pairs developed in a number of other passerines with a M13-tailed forward primer (see Burg et al, 2005). Of those that yielded PCR products, five loci were monomorphic (BT6, Escu1, Escu3, Pocc2 and Titgata88; Hanotte et al, 1994;Bensch et al, 1997;Otter et al, 2001;Wang et al, 2005), and eight were polymorphic (Escu4, Escu6, Pat14, Pat43, Pdo5, Ppi2, Titgata02 and Titgata39; Hanotte et al, 1994;Otter et al, 1998;Griffith et al, 1999;Martinez et al, 1999;Wang et al, 2005;Supplementary Table S3). The PCR used a two-step annealing process with eight cycles at T 1 and 31 cycles at T 2 .…”
Section: Lab Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small number of individuals from geographically distant populations (AKA and NL) were screened using 20 microsatellite primer pairs developed in a number of other passerines with a M13-tailed forward primer (see Burg et al, 2005). Of those that yielded PCR products, five loci were monomorphic (BT6, Escu1, Escu3, Pocc2 and Titgata88; Hanotte et al, 1994;Bensch et al, 1997;Otter et al, 2001;Wang et al, 2005), and eight were polymorphic (Escu4, Escu6, Pat14, Pat43, Pdo5, Ppi2, Titgata02 and Titgata39; Hanotte et al, 1994;Otter et al, 1998;Griffith et al, 1999;Martinez et al, 1999;Wang et al, 2005;Supplementary Table S3). The PCR used a two-step annealing process with eight cycles at T 1 and 31 cycles at T 2 .…”
Section: Lab Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We scored dominance relationships between dyads based on competitive interactions for seeds. Males were identified as dominant in a single interaction when they (1) supplanted or chased an opponent, (2) successfully resisted a supplanting attack, (3) elicited a submissive posture in another individual, or (4) fed while an opponent waited to approach (Otter et al 1998). Interactions at feeders were representative of relationships between flock-mates at other sites during winter (Smith 1991, D. J. Mennill unpubl.…”
Section: July 2008mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dominant males show improved territory acquisition (Desrochers et al 1988) and territory size (Mennill et al 2004). High social status enhances fitness through greater hatching and fledging success of young (Otter et al 1999) and higher rates of genetic paternity (Otter et al 1998, Mennill et al 2004. Dominant males are also preferred as the new mates of females that divorce Ratcliffe 1996, Ramsay et al 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assessed dominance rank by observing dyadic interactions around the feeders. We used three behaviors to identify the flock hierarchy: if (1) a focal bird supplanted or chased away its opponent, (2) the focal bird gave a display that elicited a submissive posture in an opponent, or (3) the opponent waited for the bird to leave before approaching a feeder (Ficken et al 1990, Otter et al 1998, the focal bird was considered to be dominant to its opponent. Thus we determined a linear dominance matrix for each flock, classifying birds as low, mid, or high ranking, according to their position within the flock.…”
Section: Winter Banding and Dominance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%