2013
DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2012.714062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do female/male distinctions in language matter? Evidence from gender political quotas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart (Santacreu-Vasut et al 2013). Panel C of Table 2 lists some examples of English and German WALS features.…”
Section: Linguistic Approaches: the Tree And The Wals Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart (Santacreu-Vasut et al 2013). Panel C of Table 2 lists some examples of English and German WALS features.…”
Section: Linguistic Approaches: the Tree And The Wals Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in the previous section, this measure has been used by economists Santacreu-Vasut et al, 2013); Hicks et al, 2015;Gay et al, 2016Gay et al, , 2017 to document that women who live in countries where the grammar is gender-based face stronger barriers to economic participation and are more likely to behave according to traditional gender norms of behaviour.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Givati and Troiano (2012) use gender marking in pronouns as an instrumental variable for maternity leave laws. Gay et al (2013) show that women who live in countries where grammar is sex-based face barriers in accessing labour, land, and credit markets, and Santacreu-Vasut et al, (2013) find that these women face barriers in the implementation of gender political quotas. Hicks et al (2015) show that migrant households that speak languages with sexbased grammar are more likely to allocate household labour on the basis of gender.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The linguistic gender marking gap is calculated based on the Gender Intensity Index (GII) presented at length by Santacreu-Vasut et al (2013) and Santacreu-Vasut et al (2014).…”
Section: Gender Intensity Index Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%