2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do gender differences persist? An examination of gender diversity on firm performance, risk, and executive compensation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
255
5
20

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 369 publications
(304 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
24
255
5
20
Order By: Relevance
“…However, prior studies suggest that TBD (gender and ethnic diversity) impacts positively on FP (e.g., Borghesi et al, 2016;Carter et al, 2003;Delis et al, 2016;Estelyi & Nisar, 2016;Gyapong et al, 2016;Ntim, 2015;Terjesen et al, 2015), voluntary CG disclosure (AlBassam et al, 2016;Elmagrhi et al, 2016;Abdulrahman et al, 2017;Elamer et al, 2017), audit quality (Gul et al, 2008), board monitoring (Triana et al, 2013), board meetings (Adams & Ferreira, 2009), dividend payout (Byoun et al, 2013), risk disclosure and social responsibility (Barako & Brown, 2008;Brammer et al, 2007;Ntim & Soobaroyen, 2013;Haque & Ntim, 2017), but negatively on executive pay (Gregory-Smith et al 2014;Newton, 2015;Ntim et al, 2015Perryman et al, 2016) and earnings management (Elghuweel et al, 2017). Observably, none of these studies relate to the charity sector and therefore, highlighting the lack of evidence.…”
Section: Charity Tbd and Csmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, prior studies suggest that TBD (gender and ethnic diversity) impacts positively on FP (e.g., Borghesi et al, 2016;Carter et al, 2003;Delis et al, 2016;Estelyi & Nisar, 2016;Gyapong et al, 2016;Ntim, 2015;Terjesen et al, 2015), voluntary CG disclosure (AlBassam et al, 2016;Elmagrhi et al, 2016;Abdulrahman et al, 2017;Elamer et al, 2017), audit quality (Gul et al, 2008), board monitoring (Triana et al, 2013), board meetings (Adams & Ferreira, 2009), dividend payout (Byoun et al, 2013), risk disclosure and social responsibility (Barako & Brown, 2008;Brammer et al, 2007;Ntim & Soobaroyen, 2013;Haque & Ntim, 2017), but negatively on executive pay (Gregory-Smith et al 2014;Newton, 2015;Ntim et al, 2015Perryman et al, 2016) and earnings management (Elghuweel et al, 2017). Observably, none of these studies relate to the charity sector and therefore, highlighting the lack of evidence.…”
Section: Charity Tbd and Csmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But again, this is not the whole story. Moreover, diversity and gender questions are also increasingly addressed in this domain [100,101]. Regarding social analysis, the following two output types are used as indicators and included in the subsequent analysis: (iii) Employment-As the core social role for companies is to provide work and income, the full-time equivalent (FTE) figure from the corporate LSP reports (usually figure at year end/31.12.)…”
Section: Sustainability Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Adams et al 2015). Very recent work finds a positive relationship between board diversity and financial performance (Perryman et al 2016;Reguera-Alvarado et al 2015). In a large-scale international study of 22 000 companies from 91 countries, Noland et al (2016) found a positive association between female share of TMTs and firm performance in data for 2014 but found no effect of board membership or board gender quotas on firm performance.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Examples of positive implications of gender diversity include: improved group decision-making (Erhardt et al 2003), improved managerial task performance (Dezsö and Ross 2012), enhanced legitimacy (Perrault 2015), introduction of new ideas and skills (Reguera-Alvarado et al 2015), more innovative and creative decision-making (Bantel and Jackson 1989), better reflection of customer and stakeholder needs (Konrad et al 2008), deeper and more extensive consideration of issues (Post and Byron 2015), and increased social capital and social responsibility (Bear et al 2010). Specific to the impact of women on teams, they tend to reduce company risk taking and are associated with greater company performance (Perryman et al 2016), despite higher turnover and absenteeism (Campbell and Mínguez-Vera 2008). In addition, those companies that pursue a more gender diverse leadership team and workforce will be tapping into a highly educated and skilled talent pool as, for example, in the United States (US), the greater proportion of college degrees are now earned by females (Catalyst 2004).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation