“Do I really need it?”: An explorative study of acceptance and usage of in-vehicle technology

Stiegemeier, Dina; Bringeland, Sabrina; Kraus, Johannes; Baumann, Martin

doi:10.1016/j.trf.2021.11.011

Cited by 28 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several other studies have shown the importance of trust, including a recent study by Stiegemeier et al. [32]. However, the same study concluded that the most common reason for non‐use was that the drivers did not feel that they needed the system or needed it seldom in relation to the character of their daily drives, that is, on which type of roads or for how long.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is, for example, important to find out which contexts are perceived by drivers as suitable for DAS, and whether the contexts are encountered often enough for drivers to experience the systems as useful (cf. [32]). Based on the present study these contexts include different traffic situations, weather conditions, as well as differences in driver state.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Novakazi et al [31] proposed for example that drivers differ in perceptions of and/or trust in the respective systems in different contexts and that these factors can explain in part the differences in usage. Several other studies have shown the importance of trust, including a recent study by Stiegemeier et al [32]. However, the same study concluded that the most common reason for nonuse was that the drivers did not feel that they needed the system or needed it seldom in relation to the character of their daily drives, that is, on which type of roads or for how long.…”

Section: Onmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Drivers’ usage of driving automation systems in different contexts: A survey in China, Germany, Spain and USA

Karlsson

Novakazi

2023

IET Intelligent Trans Sys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the study was to investigate how drivers use assisted and automated driving systems (DAS), more specifically their usage of SAE Level 1 and Level 2 systems, in different situations. An online survey was distributed to 2500 respondents in China, Germany, Spain, and the USA. The final dataset consisted of 549 respondents, all non‐professional drivers, with access to a minimum of a Level 1 system. A subset, 159 in total, had access also to a Level 2 DAS. The survey included questions on the attitude towards, access to, and usage of Level 1 and Level 2 systems in nine different situations respectively. The data was analysed on an individual and a national level. A cluster analysis showed two main groups: frequent and non‐frequent users. On an individual level, the reported usage of Level 1 and Level 2 DAS respectively differed depending on traffic situation, weather and daylight conditions and driver state. Reports by respondents with access to both Level 1 and Level 2 systems did not reveal any statistically significant differences in usage between situations. The Spanish sample was the only one that showed a consistently different usage pattern compared to samples from China, Germany, and the USA.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Onmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Drivers’ usage of driving automation systems in different contexts: A survey in China, Germany, Spain and USA

Karlsson

Novakazi

2023

IET Intelligent Trans Sys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Also with today's assisted/automated driving, such as ACC and lane-keeping assist, drivers show disuse for reasons related to personal predispositions (e.g. 'I don't need it', 'I am able to stay in the lane myself') and low perceived reliability ('The system does not work well', 'The system annoys me', 'The systems distract me and I want to concentrate only on driving') (Stiegemeier et al 2022).…”

Section: Pitfall 6: Disusementioning

confidence: 99%

Shared control versus traded control in driving: a debate around automation pitfalls

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A major question in human-automation interaction is whether tasks should be traded or shared between human and automation. This work presents reflections-which have evolved through classroom debates between the authors over the past 10 years-on these two forms of humanautomation interaction, with a focus on the automated driving domain. As in the lectures, we start with a historically informed survey of six pitfalls of automation: (1) Loss of situation and mode awareness, (2) Deskilling, (3) Unbalanced mental workload, (4) Behavioural adaptation, (5) Misuse, and (6) Disuse. Next, one of the authors explains why he believes that haptic shared control may remedy the pitfalls. Next, another author rebuts these arguments, arguing that traded control is the most promising way to improve road safety. This article ends with a common ground, explaining that shared and traded control outperform each other at medium and low environmental complexity, respectively. Practitioner summary: Designers of automation systems will have to consider whether humans and automation should perform tasks alternately or simultaneously. The present article provides an in-depth reflection on this dilemma, which may prove insightful and help guide design.

show abstract

“…Although there has been a considerable amount of academic research on IVI systems and in-vehicle gaming, the issue of low usage rates of in-vehicle gaming has not been well addressed so far. Many scholars have conducted research on the acceptance and promotion of IVI, such as Stiegemeier et al (2022), who analyzed the factors that influence user acceptance of vehicle technology, including ''preference, '' ''distrust,'' ''safety,'' ''knowledge,'' and ''habit'';D.-H. Kim and Lee (2016) and J. explored the resistance factors that affect user acceptance or use of IVI systems. However, these studies are mainly focused on IVI systems and do not specifically concentrate on in-vehicle gaming, making it difficult to provide targeted development recommendations for in-vehicle gaming.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Compatibility as a Prerequisite: Research on the Factors Influencing the Continuous Use Intention of In-vehicle Games Based on Diffusion of Innovations Theory

Deng,

Li,

Chen

2023

Sage Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As an emerging game category, in-vehicle games have great development potential, but the factors influencing users’ acceptance and continuance intention of in-car games were still not determined. This study used the three perceived attributes of Diffusion of Innovations Theory, compatibility, complexity, and relative advantage, as basis and introduced perceived habits, fit, interaction quality, experience, play value, and continuous use intention to establish the users’ continuance intention model of in-vehicle games. The results of 305 valid questionnaires indicate that compatibility and play value have significant positive influence on continuance intention, of which fit shows stronger effect; perceived habits have significant influence on fit and interaction quality; both fit and quality have significant influence on experience; experience have significant influence on play value. The results of this study can provide reference for promotion design of in-vehicle games and important guidance for future development for in-vehicle game industry.

show abstract

“Do I really need it?”: An explorative study of acceptance and usage of in-vehicle technology

Cited by 28 publications

References 57 publications

Drivers’ usage of driving automation systems in different contexts: A survey in China, Germany, Spain and USA

Drivers’ usage of driving automation systems in different contexts: A survey in China, Germany, Spain and USA

Shared control versus traded control in driving: a debate around automation pitfalls

Compatibility as a Prerequisite: Research on the Factors Influencing the Continuous Use Intention of In-vehicle Games Based on Diffusion of Innovations Theory

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About