2018
DOI: 10.5817/cp2018-4-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

”Do I really need to help?!” Perceived severity of cyberbullying, victim blaming, and bystanders’ willingness to help the victim

Abstract: Whether bystanders in cyberbullying help a victim or remain passive is based on multilayered cognitive processes. In particular, perceiving and interpreting an incident as an emergency situation, realizing one’s own responsibility to intervene, and forming the intention to help are crucial preconditions for bystander interventions. The characteristics of information and communication technologies (ICTs) change and hamper these cognitive processes. Information and cues that guide individuals’ reactions to offli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There was some victim-blaming in the responses, see also [62,63], with some students, particularly survey respondents, saying that people too often left themselves vulnerable to being cyberbullied and therefore should not be surprised if they suffered the consequences.…”
Section: Protecting One's Privacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was some victim-blaming in the responses, see also [62,63], with some students, particularly survey respondents, saying that people too often left themselves vulnerable to being cyberbullied and therefore should not be surprised if they suffered the consequences.…”
Section: Protecting One's Privacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bystanders to emergencies, crises, and abuse may respond in ways that escalate or halt the situation. While bystander responses to crises and emergencies have been studied in violence/sexual assault (Chabot et al, 2018;Lukacena et al, 2019), medical emergency (Fischer et al, 2011), cyberbullying (Koehler and Weber, 2018), and school bullying settings (Jenkins and Nickerson, 2019), there is far less in the workplace bullying context (Mulder et al, 2016;Paull et al, 2012), especially related to target sexual orientation as an antecedant.…”
Section: Bystander Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myriad factors have been shown to influence the bystander's propensity to act -gender (Poteat and Vecho, 2016), relationship/friendship with the target (Coyne et al, 2019;Ryan and Wessel, 2012;D'Cruz and Noranda, 2010), perceived severity of the incident (Koehler and Weber, 2018), attributed target responsibility (Mulder et al, 2014), empathy (Nickerson et al, 2014) and accomplices (Namie and Lutgen-Sandvik, 2010). Bystander responses to emergency situations are complex and involve cognitive, emotional, and behavioral components (Koehler and Weber, 2018). Additionally, the context of the situation may also play a part in influencing bystander perceptions and decisions.…”
Section: Bystander Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los espectadores, usualmente, no asumen la responsabilidad de intervenir si entienden que hay otras personas que podrían hacerlo; por tanto, la responsabilidad de ayudar se desplaza hacia el grupo, a otra persona, a los amigos de la víctima o a los adultos (Boyd, 2014;DeSmet et al, 2012;DeSmet et al, 2016;Macháčková et al, 2013). Koehler & Weber (2018) señalan que los espectadores de cyberbullying evalúan como más severas las agresiones que incluyen amenazas, en comparación con aquellas en las que solo se presentan insultos. Asimismo, los espectadores que anteriormente estuvieron involucrados en situaciones de cyberbullying, sea en calidad de víctimas o agresores, suelen tener mayor inclinación a auxiliar a las víctimas (Leung et al, 2018).…”
Section: Miedo Yunclassified