2018
DOI: 10.1108/jes-04-2017-0100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do infrastructure and quality of governance matter for manufacturing productivity? Empirical evidence from the Indian states

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to study the impact of infrastructure and governance quality on the state-level productivity of Indian manufacturing for the period 2008–2011. Design/methodology/approach The authors first rank Indian states on their quality of governance using benefit-of-the-doubt approach. Next, to explain state-level differences in total factor productivity (TFP), the authors assess the impact of a composite index of governance on industrial TFP of Indian states using alternate techniq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative impact is stronger on CS (customer satisfaction) than on OGS (organizational goal satisfaction). This finding is in line with another study conducted to explore the impact of governance quality on the performance of the Indian manufacturing sector (Khanna and Sharma, 2018). While judicial service quality did not show significant impact, the “public service deliveries of economic infrastructure” exhibited significant impact on industrial performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The negative impact is stronger on CS (customer satisfaction) than on OGS (organizational goal satisfaction). This finding is in line with another study conducted to explore the impact of governance quality on the performance of the Indian manufacturing sector (Khanna and Sharma, 2018). While judicial service quality did not show significant impact, the “public service deliveries of economic infrastructure” exhibited significant impact on industrial performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…New economic geography also shows that infrastructure is an important stimulus for economic development, and the construction of a transport infrastructure has a positive effect on economic growth. Research results not only support the above conclusion but also are consistent with the argument that infrastructure is positively correlated with economic growth (Liu and Zhang, 2014; Khanna and Sharma, 2018). This also shows that the integration of a transport infrastructure in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei not only accelerates the movement of economic factors, but also promotes the economic development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei.…”
Section: Analysis Of Hsfm Estimates For Different Regionssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is of vital importance for an improvement in regional economic efficiency. Most scholars agree that an open-door policy has a positive effect on economic efficiency (Khanna and Sharma, 2018). Research results show that economic efficiency is not significantly improved by the foreign investment arising from the economic opening of the districts, counties, and cities of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei.…”
Section: Analysis Of Hsfm Estimates For Different Regionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Further research results in the year 2017-2019 as follows Murova (2017) and Khanna & Sharma (2018) start by looking at that to increase the growth is by increasing the effectiveness of the public area. Nguyen (2018) said the government is raising the capital stock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%