2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x16001928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do innate stereotypies serve as a basis for swallowing and learned speech movements?

Abstract: Keven & Akins suggest that innate stereotypies like TP/R may participate in the acquisition of tongue control. This commentary examines this claim in the context of speech motor learning and biomechanics, proposing that stereotypies could provide a basis for both swallowing and speech movements, and provides biomechanical simulation results to supplement neurological evidence for similarities between the two behaviors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since these gestures are spontaneously produced both in the womb (without any model) and perinatal life but disappear around 3 months, neonatal imitation could represent an epiphenomenon better explained by sensorimotor development. Crucially for the purpose of the current review, Keven and Akins (2017) also proposed that perinatal stereotypic gestures participate in the acquisition of orofacial motor control that, in turn, may support not only swallowing of solid food but also motor biomechanics for speech-like sounds production emerging by month 3 (also see Choi et al, 2017 ; Mayer et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Homo Imitans? Methodological and Theoretical Controversiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since these gestures are spontaneously produced both in the womb (without any model) and perinatal life but disappear around 3 months, neonatal imitation could represent an epiphenomenon better explained by sensorimotor development. Crucially for the purpose of the current review, Keven and Akins (2017) also proposed that perinatal stereotypic gestures participate in the acquisition of orofacial motor control that, in turn, may support not only swallowing of solid food but also motor biomechanics for speech-like sounds production emerging by month 3 (also see Choi et al, 2017 ; Mayer et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Homo Imitans? Methodological and Theoretical Controversiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D tongue model of ArtiSynth has been used to study physiological activities of the tongue in speech production (Dabbaghchian et al, 2017;Gick et al, 2014;Mayer et al, 2017) and articulatory motivation of phonological patterns (Jang, 2020). In the model, tongue muscles are implemented in a mesh structure based on accurate anatomical data derived from medical studies (Miyawaki, 1974;Netter, 1989;Takemoto, 2001).…”
Section: Biomechanical 3d Tongue Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomechanical simulations predict movements that result from prescribed forces, e.g., muscle forces, by solving equations that represent the mechanics of the musculoskeletal system. These methods have been applied to various complex structures involved in speech, such as the tongue (Gick et al 2017;Mayer et al 2017;Stavness et al 2011), the soft palate (Anderson et al 2019;Gick et al 2014), the larynx , and the lips (Nazari et al 2010(Nazari et al , 2011Stavness et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%