2017
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/04/003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do joint CMB and HST data support a scale invariant spectrum?

Abstract: We combine current measurements of the local expansion rate, H0, and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) estimates of helium abundance with the latest cosmic microwave background (CMB) data from the Planck Collaboration to discuss the observational viability of the scale invariant HarrisonZeldovch-Peebles (HZP) spectrum. We also analyze some of its extensions, namely, HZP + YP and HZP + N ef f , where YP is the primordial helium mass fraction and N ef f is the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom. We… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We set the sum of neutrino masses as m ν = 0.06 eV and the pivot scale as k 0 = 0.05 Mpc −1 . We take the reasonable range of the number of e-folds, N e ∈ [50,60]. We modify the Cos-moMC code [77] to solve the Boltzmann equations and explore the cosmological parameter space.…”
Section: Models and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We set the sum of neutrino masses as m ν = 0.06 eV and the pivot scale as k 0 = 0.05 Mpc −1 . We take the reasonable range of the number of e-folds, N e ∈ [50,60]. We modify the Cos-moMC code [77] to solve the Boltzmann equations and explore the cosmological parameter space.…”
Section: Models and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We take µ/M pl = 0.1 (solid lines) and µ/M pl = 0.01 (dashed lines), respectively. The values between small and big dots correspond to the number of e-folds of N e ∈ [50,60]. The gray line (η = 0) can distinguish between the convex potential (η > 0) and the concave potential (η < 0).…”
Section: The Prototype Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, which illustrates how N eff varies with k UV for some particular values of n T . Unlike the constraints on n T from LIGO, 7 e.g., BBN imposes constraints on the quantity N eff , 6 Previous CMB data allowed even higher values of N eff and H 0 implying a stronger preference for models that predict an extra contribution to N eff (see, e.g., [34,35]). 7 Constraints from LIGO are more robust in the sense that they constrain directly n T instead of a quantity that can be degenerated to modifications on the neutrino sector.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[46,47] for a more detailed discussion). The Bayesian evidence E is defined as the marginal likelihood for the model M i :…”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%