2023
DOI: 10.1017/psa.2023.151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Machine Learning Models Represent Their Targets?

Emily Sullivan

Abstract: I argue that ML models used in science function as highly idealized toy models. If we treat ML models as a type of highly idealized toy model, then we can deploy standard representational and epistemic strategies from the toy model literature to explain why ML models can still provide epistemic success despite their lack of similarity to their targets.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 There is also a rich debate regarding the nature of ML opacity itself (Boge, 2022;Creel, 2020), but for this we direct our readers to Buchholz, 2023). 9 Though Sullivan (2023) argues that ML models can be assessed in a similar way as simulations, or 'toy models.' 10 There is a rich debate on whether there is actually a difference between opacity in human reasoning and the reasoning of machine learning models and whether this difference matters.…”
Section: Endnotesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 There is also a rich debate regarding the nature of ML opacity itself (Boge, 2022;Creel, 2020), but for this we direct our readers to Buchholz, 2023). 9 Though Sullivan (2023) argues that ML models can be assessed in a similar way as simulations, or 'toy models.' 10 There is a rich debate on whether there is actually a difference between opacity in human reasoning and the reasoning of machine learning models and whether this difference matters.…”
Section: Endnotesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Though Sullivan (2023) argues that ML models can be assessed in a similar way as simulations, or ‘toy models.’ …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%