2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2006.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do macro variables, asset markets, or surveys forecast inflation better?

Abstract: Surveys do! We examine the forecasting power of four alternative methods of forecasting U.S. inflation out-of-sample: time series ARIMA models; regressions using real activity measures motivated from the Phillips curve; term structure models that include linear, non-linear, and arbitrage-free specifications; and survey-based measures. We also investigate several optimal methods of combining forecasts. Our results show that surveys outperform the other forecasting methods and that the term structure specificati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
286
10
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 757 publications
(315 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
16
286
10
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(Note 16) This result is also reflected in the values of Theil's U being smaller than one for most performance tests. Diebold-Mariano test statistics shows that the forecasting performance of survey-based inflation expectations is somewhat better than that of statistical time series processes (in line with the findings in Ang, Bekaert, and Wei (2007) for the United States), while inflation swap-based expectations are significant for improving the forecast performance, in particular for longer horizons. However, it needs to be stressed that for most cases, although inflation swaps and SPF have lower forecasting errors, the difference in performance is not statistically significant for the considered samples.…”
Section: Methodology and Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Note 16) This result is also reflected in the values of Theil's U being smaller than one for most performance tests. Diebold-Mariano test statistics shows that the forecasting performance of survey-based inflation expectations is somewhat better than that of statistical time series processes (in line with the findings in Ang, Bekaert, and Wei (2007) for the United States), while inflation swap-based expectations are significant for improving the forecast performance, in particular for longer horizons. However, it needs to be stressed that for most cases, although inflation swaps and SPF have lower forecasting errors, the difference in performance is not statistically significant for the considered samples.…”
Section: Methodology and Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Assessing the actual performance of various measures of inflation expectations is important given the key role ascribed to inflation expectations in the inflation generating process. The usefulness of survey-based measures of inflation expectations in forecasting inflation has been documented in Ang, Bekaert, and Wei (2007). In a similar vein, Gil-Alana, Moreno, and Perez de Gracia (2012) report that, for the United States, survey-based expectations outperform standard time series models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Its advantages are: the forecast accuracy (specialists' and consumers' expectations are better predictors of a year ahead inflation), there is no need of any a priori assumption (which is needed in a model based forecasts), there is no contamination of the data by transaction costs, risk premium, and taxation (which is characteristic of financial assets prices) (Ang, 2007). The survey based expectations are also used in this study.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, economic theory based forecasting such as Phillips curve, Term structure and asset pricing models are also successful in the inflation forecasting. However, in practice, the best forecasts are still the subjective ones, which come from survey such as Blue Chip, SPF and Greenbook, this fact has been found by a number of research, see in Ang, Bekaert, and Wei (2007), Faust and Wright (2013). With this regard, I use survey of professional forecasters (SPF) as major benchmark to compare with neural network forecasting, however, I will list some major methods as references.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%