2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1964255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Managers Trade on Public or Private Information? Evidence from Fundamental Valuations

Abstract: Using accounting-based (residual income) valuations, this study examines the extent to which abnormal returns after insider share trades are explained by private information versus mispricing of public information. For a sample of insider trades in the Netherlands (1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008), I find that managers' share purchase decisions are associated with positive future abnormal returns as well as equity undervaluation. Even though undervaluation results in predictable pric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 93 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We make contributions to at least three distinct literature streams. First, we contribute to the discussion on the sources of insiders' trading profits (Aboody & Lev 2000;Ke et al 2003;Bartov & Mohanram 2004;Ahuja et al 2005;Piotroski & Roulstone 2005;Cheng et al 2007;Cohen et al 2012;Veenman 2012) by documenting that insiders exploit information asymmetries that are generated by the nature of the patent application process. In that respect, this paper is most closely related to studies by Ahuja et al (2005) and Aboody and Lev (2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We make contributions to at least three distinct literature streams. First, we contribute to the discussion on the sources of insiders' trading profits (Aboody & Lev 2000;Ke et al 2003;Bartov & Mohanram 2004;Ahuja et al 2005;Piotroski & Roulstone 2005;Cheng et al 2007;Cohen et al 2012;Veenman 2012) by documenting that insiders exploit information asymmetries that are generated by the nature of the patent application process. In that respect, this paper is most closely related to studies by Ahuja et al (2005) and Aboody and Lev (2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%