2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2015.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Metacognitions and Intolerance of Uncertainty Predict Worry in Everyday Life? An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
7
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A related limitation is the use of a trait measure of worry which precludes an examination of the interrelationships between state worry and distress over time. The evidentiary base for the present findings should be strengthened further in future studies by collecting data across multiple time-points, ideally using more advanced methods of data collection, such as Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA: Shiffman, Stone, & Hufford, 2008; for an example: Thielsch, Andor, & Ehring, 2015). An additional limitation is the use of a small number of predictors to explain symptom levels over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related limitation is the use of a trait measure of worry which precludes an examination of the interrelationships between state worry and distress over time. The evidentiary base for the present findings should be strengthened further in future studies by collecting data across multiple time-points, ideally using more advanced methods of data collection, such as Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA: Shiffman, Stone, & Hufford, 2008; for an example: Thielsch, Andor, & Ehring, 2015). An additional limitation is the use of a small number of predictors to explain symptom levels over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases, lagged predictor variables were person-centered (also called group-mean centering) prior to the analysis in order to measure true within-person fluctuations and dependencies, instead of between-person differences. Furthermore, all analyses were conducted in Mplus (Muthèn & Muthèn, 1998-2012: Parameters were estimated using a robust maximum likelihood approach and missing data were handled with full information maximum likelihood.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Sica et al (2007) found that negative beliefs about worry predicted worry symptoms after controlling for baseline symptoms of worry and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Likewise, Thielsch et al (2015) reported negative metacognitions to predict worry after controlling for trait worry and stress. Moreover, Yilmaz et al (2011) demonstrated that negative beliefs about worry predicted anxiety after controlling for age, gender, baseline symptoms and life events, and Hjemdal et al (2013) reported metacognitive beliefs to predict anxiety over a period of 3 months after controlling for age, gender and baseline symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%