2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00390-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do national medicinal drug policies and essential drug programs improve drug use?: a review of experiences in developing countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social, economic, and health dynamics shape patterns in the use of medicines. In developing economies, social class inequalities can have an additional impact on expanding the right to access to medicines and their rational use 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social, economic, and health dynamics shape patterns in the use of medicines. In developing economies, social class inequalities can have an additional impact on expanding the right to access to medicines and their rational use 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally the mounting concerns towards access to affordable medicines have pushed the governments especially in developing economies to develop national policies in order to increase the affordability, supply, safety, and RUM (Ratanawijitrasin et al, 2001). Among nine components of NMP indicated by WHO, two clearly emphasize on affordability and drug financing.…”
Section: National Medicine Policies (Nmps)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FGDOP regulates mainly four aspects of medicines use: safety, quality, efficacy and price. Traditionally, governments in many countries, particularly developed nations have attempted to ensure the efficiency, safety, rational prescribing, and dispensing of drugs through premarketing registration, licensing and other regulatory requirements (Ratanwijitrasin et al, 2001).…”
Section: Medicines Legislation Framework In Sudanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings from most published studies lack comparable quantitative information that would allow for objective judging whether and by how much progress on the various outcomes have been made by the implementation of the pharmaceutical regulations. To ignore evaluations and to implement drug regulation based on logic and theory is to expose society to untried measures in the same way patients were exposed to untested medicines (Ratanwijitrasin et al, 2001). In Sudan, the researchers did not identify any rigorous evaluations or quantitative studies about the impact of drug regulations on the quality of medicines and how to protect public health against counterfeit or low quality medicines, although it is practically possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%