2015
DOI: 10.1515/cogsem-2015-0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do natural pictures mean natural tastes? Assessing visual semantics experimentally

Abstract: A widespread assumption in Danish consumer law is that if the package of a food product carries a picture of a potentially taste-giving ingredient (say, a strawberry), then consumers will expect the corresponding taste to stem primarily from that ingredient rather than from artificial flavouring. However, this is not expected to be the case if the packaging carries only a verbal indication of the potential ingredient (say, the word

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, considering that individuals hold expectations regarding the naturalness of different product types (Smith, Barratt, & Selsøe, 2015), researchers can use stimuli (e.g., images of food) pre-tested regarding their perceived level of transformation (see Foroni et al, 2013). Moreover, future studies could also assess beliefs regarding whole and processed foods (e.g., European Food Information Council, 2016), as well as regarding organic food, and examine if such individual differences modulate the impact of the food production claims.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, considering that individuals hold expectations regarding the naturalness of different product types (Smith, Barratt, & Selsøe, 2015), researchers can use stimuli (e.g., images of food) pre-tested regarding their perceived level of transformation (see Foroni et al, 2013). Moreover, future studies could also assess beliefs regarding whole and processed foods (e.g., European Food Information Council, 2016), as well as regarding organic food, and examine if such individual differences modulate the impact of the food production claims.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For consumers, it is particularly important since it lets them know about the visual aspect of the product before buying it, making it a key element in the creation of expectations (Jaeger & MacFie, 2001;Underwood & Klein, 2002). The consumer's response depends on the characteristics of the image as well as whether it is an illustration or a photography (Deliza, Macfie, & Hedderley, 2003;Smith, Barratt, & Selsøe Sørensen, 2015), its size (Neyens, Aerts, & Smits, 2015), the quantity of product units displayed (Madzharov & Block, 2010) and the product used as a serving suggestion (Rebollar et al, 2016). However, in practice the designer very frequently chooses from a selection of different images of the product in which the main variation is the way in which it is represented (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial pictures are more inauthentic and idealistic, such as non-realistic pictures. A study by Smith et al (2015) selects 12 kinds of food in the market and created two types of images for each of them: one is a photo, the other is an artist’s painting. The audience often considers photos to be more evidential or documentary.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%