2016
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.245940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do neighbours matter in technology adoption? The case of conservation tillage in northwest Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This valuable knowledge can guide policymakers and stakeholders in implementing targeted interventions to enhance awareness and promote profitability among farmers. Ultimately, these efforts will lead to safer and more sustainable agricultural practices (Baah Annor, 2018;Babu et al, 2018;Kassie, 2018;Meena et al, 2020;Ofori et al, 2015;Pacini et al, 2003;Tessema et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This valuable knowledge can guide policymakers and stakeholders in implementing targeted interventions to enhance awareness and promote profitability among farmers. Ultimately, these efforts will lead to safer and more sustainable agricultural practices (Baah Annor, 2018;Babu et al, 2018;Kassie, 2018;Meena et al, 2020;Ofori et al, 2015;Pacini et al, 2003;Tessema et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These shared information among farmers influence individual behavior. For example, some researchers have argued neighbor effect determine the adoption of conservation tillage by farmers [5]. Sociability, social cohesion and trust among farmers are helpful to improve their social capital, which facilitates access to technology [6].…”
Section: Socio-economic Behaviors Associated Relationship Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exogenous effect highlights the contextual interactions, wherein the propensity of an IBB grower to behave is correlated with the exogenous characteristics of his/her neighbors. The correlated effects emphasize that small holder farmers in the same group tend to behave similarly because of commonly observed and unobserved characteristics of the group, for example, sharing a common institutional or physical environment (Tessema et al, 2016). All these three effects imply a spatial contextualization of the diffusion of IBB varieties, meaning that the decision of a bean growing household to adopt an iron bean variety is spatially correlated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Farmers may be risk-averse when they lack information pertaining to the likelihood of occurrence of the possible outcomes (e.g., yield, costs, profitability) of the new technology and such risk-averse attitude would exert a detrimental impact on adoption. Farmers may be uncertain about the economic returns of the new technology owing to insufficient knowledge about the types and costs of inputs needed, the yield distribution, expected market prices, and the demand for the produce (Ghadim & Pannell, 1999;Tessema et al, 2016). In this context, social learning and social networks often complement and/or act as substitutes in delivering information and facilitating the technology diffusion process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%