2014
DOI: 10.1177/0142723714535768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do nimble hands make for nimble lexicons? Fine motor skills predict knowledge of embodied vocabulary items

Abstract: Theories and research in embodied cognition postulate that cognition grounded in action enjoys a processing advantage. Extending this theory to the study of how fine motor skills (FMS) link to vocabulary development in preschool children, the authors investigated FMS and vocabulary in 76 preschoolers. Building on previous research, they hypothesized that links between FMS and vocabulary were driven by lexical items containing a greater body-object interaction (BOI). After controlling for age and part of speech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
51
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(123 reference statements)
6
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, our findings are in line with previous work suggesting that FMS contributes to cognitive development beyond effects of maturation (Grissmer et al., ; Suggate & Stoeger, ). However, they also lend weight to the assumption that the relationship between FMS and mathematics reported in other studies (Luo et al., ; Pitchford et al., ; Son & Meisels, ) could be due to an early effect of FMS on children's counting skills.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, our findings are in line with previous work suggesting that FMS contributes to cognitive development beyond effects of maturation (Grissmer et al., ; Suggate & Stoeger, ). However, they also lend weight to the assumption that the relationship between FMS and mathematics reported in other studies (Luo et al., ; Pitchford et al., ; Son & Meisels, ) could be due to an early effect of FMS on children's counting skills.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This adds to the emerging field of embodied numerosity (Domahs et al, 2010;Moeller et al, 2012) that suggests an association between finger representations and numerical processing, not just at a behavioral but also at a neural level (Andres et al, 2007). Especially in light of research on associations between FMS and other variables such as reading or cognitive abilities (Suggate et al, 2016;Suggate & Stoeger, 2014, this study therefore highlights the importance of supporting fine motor development in preschool children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to this idea, both cognitive skills and FMS undergo sharp development in early childhood, which may give rise to spurious behavioural links that are in reality driven by maturation (Martzog, ). This idea is supported through the large predictive role that chronological age plays in both FMS and cognitive skills – however, links still exist above and beyond age (e.g., Martzog, ; Suggate & Stoeger, ). Other theories have focused on neural substrates, pointing out the proximity of motor and speech areas or the joint involvement of regions in both FMS and cognitive skills (Diamond, ; James & Gauthier, ).…”
Section: Fine Motor Skills Grapho‐motor Skills and Handwritingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Achievement data in early literacy learning (Alberta Education, 2014; Shonkoff & Phillips, 2000 indicate two concerning trends: overall, general slippage in early literacy development outcomes and, secondly, a persistent and growing achievement gap over time in the shift to academic literacy development among linguistically vulnerable populations of children including those raised in poverty or of language minority background. Emergent research findings suggest the etiological underpinnings to these trends may be found in children's control over fine motor skills and their influence on language learning as these are the major drivers of literacy development over time (Suggate & Stoeger, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%